Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
In a speech on this week, President Barack Obama reaffirmed his intention to close down Guantanamo Bay detention camp in Cuba.
"We've got to close Guantanamo," Obama said at a highly publicized press conference, before taking a moral stance. "The idea that we would still maintain forever a group of individuals that have not been tried — that needs to stop."
However, there's an even more basic factor: the numbers.
In a new Reuters report, the economics of the camp are laid out.
It's pretty ugly — as the U.S. and Cuba don't have good relations, almost everything at the camp has to be specially imported to the site. Here are some unsettling figures:
- The Pentagon says the camp costs $150 million each year.
- This means the average cost for keeping inmates in Guantanamo is $903,614 (there are currently 166 inmates within the facility).
- The average cost of keeping an inmate at a super-maximum security prison within United States borders is around $60,000 to $70,000.
- At a regular prison it's closer to $30,000.
- Even if we take a high end of $70,000, this means the detention facility in Guantanamo is almost 13 times more expensive per inmate than U.S.-based facilities.
- If we assume that the costs have been relatively constant for the 11 years it's been open, we could assume that the facility has cost around $1.6 billion.
- That could be a low figure, however. Ken Gude, chief of staff and vice president at the liberal Center for American Progress think tank told Reuters it has been "probably more than $2 billion." In fact, The New York Timeshas reported that documents show the camp cost taxpayers "more than $2 billion" between 2002 and 2009 alone.
That's a pretty big expenditure in an age of economic belt-tightening, and it may not get better anytime soon. General John Kelly, the head of Southern Command (the unit in charge of the detention center) recently asked a House of Representatives panel for $170 million extra to improve facilities.
Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.
Join the conversation about this story »
Image may be NSFW.Clik here to view.
| Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.  Image may be NSFW.Clik here to view.  Image may be NSFW.Clik here to view.  Image may be NSFW.Clik here to view.  Image may be NSFW.Clik here to view.  |
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.Clik here to view.
