Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 92742 articles
Browse latest View live

Why The BBC Sex Abuse Scandal is Bigger than Anyone In The US Can Imagine

$
0
0

Jimmy Savile

LONDON, UK — On Saturday evenings for nearly two decades, most families in Britain would welcome a predatory child abuser into their homes. Although he was only an image on a television screen, they would smile with him as if he were a cherished uncle. Children wrote him letters telling him about their dreams.

For anyone who didn't grow up in the UK in the 1970s and ‘80s, it may be hard to comprehend the extent to which the Jimmy Savile sex scandal has shocked, saddened and transfixed the country.

Outsiders may appreciate that something awful has taken place: a TV presenter accused of sexually assaulting at least 300 youngsters is an appalling story in any context. But the mere facts of the case significantly understate the scandal’s deep cultural impact.

To comprehend the power Savile — who died last year aged 84 — exerted over a huge proportion of the country's population, one must appreciate the unusual relationship he had with his public.

Comparisons with popular American personalities don't do him justice. He shared Dick Clark’s broad appeal and showbiz longevity. The radio career Savile enjoyed in tandem with his television work puts him on a par with the DJ Kasey Casem. The sex-attack revelations have prompted comparisons with Jerry Sandusky, the Pennsylvania State University coach convicted of 45 counts of child abuse.

Savile was all those and much more, a towering presence in British entertainment, a lurid figure whose outlandish appearance was as compelling as it was disturbing.

Savile’s fame bought him access to many vulnerable people who would become his victims: innocent young girls who flocked to his dressing rooms, students and patients at the schools and hospitals that benefited from his charity work. It also bought entrée to millions of childish hearts.

Like many British people, I grew up in Savile’s shadow. I was one of the of the millions who curled up in front of the television set on Saturday evenings to watch "Jim'll Fix It," a BBC show in which Savile, usually attired in a gold lamé track suit, turned children's dreams into reality.

Although only a few decades ago, it was a different time, when Britain was a country synchronized by its viewing habits. In the 1970s, we were limited to three television channels that catered to young people for a just few hours a day. Whenever Savile appeared, yodeling in a coarse Yorkshire accent and chomping on a large cigar, he had a captive audience.

But Savile continued to exert an influence over us even as we grew older, as part of our shared childhood. We continued to amuse each other by impersonating his voice and repeating his meaningless catchphrases: "Now then, now then. As it happens. Goodness gracious. How's about that then?" Sometimes we gave the voices a menacing edge.

Savile never really went away. He continued to appear regularly on television until the late 1990s. His relentless charity work, which saw him run dozens of marathons even in old age, took him across the country. It was often hard to avoid him.

I'm sure I am not unique in having crossed paths with Savile several times during the past 30 years. Perhaps less common is the mild obsession I developed about him in my late teens, partly because of the peculiar sense of humor I had around that time, and partly because I found him a darkly fascinating character.

I was probably one of the few who didn't write to his show for a "fix it" as a child, largely because my dream of becoming a highwayman had already been granted to another kid. I later discovered my first girlfriend had not only written to Savile, but featured on his show, singing in a cathedral.

That didn’t stop me seeking him out. Savile was born and lived in Leeds, a large city a few miles my home in York. To relieve the teenage suburban boredom of school vacations, a couple of like-minded friends and I would sometimes catch the train to Leeds to try to spot him.

Wearing cotton wool wigs made to resemble Savile's strange mane of blond hair, we would pretend to puff on cigars. We even made posters advertising our "Jimmy Savile Days." Once we rang his doorbell and ran away. Another time we left an address on his car windscreen and duly received an autographed photo.

It all seemed very funny at the time. As did our increasingly creepy Savile impersonations in which we voiced him inviting young girls to sit on his knee. Our puerile innuendos obviously picked up on something about his personality, even though we were oblivious to the fact that he was really guilty far worse.

I had more Savile encounters in my 20s. I once entered a half-marathon for which I was hopelessly unfit. As I neared the 10-mile marker, an elderly Savile trotted past, cheered on by the crowd. I was quite impressed at the time, as when I subsequently read in his autobiography that he had once cycled to France.

A few years later, I dated a trainee nurse who sometimes worked at a Leeds hospital where Savile volunteered as a porter. She confirmed that there were whispers about Savile using his access to commit unspeakable acts on corpses in the hospital morgue.

Such rumors were entertaining at the time because they were almost, but not quite, believable. Today, with allegations emerging daily about his activities — including one claim of necrophilia — they now seem disturbingly true.

I came across Savile on other occasions when I was working as a junior reporter in and around Yorkshire. He once burst into a restaurant where I was having lunch with a contact. Evidently used to his relentlessly wandering hands and obnoxious chatter, the waitstaff greeted him with a curious mix of affection and sufferance.

In 1997, while working for a regional press agency that supplied stories to national newspapers in London, I was dispatched to a hospital where Savile was undergoing quadruple heart-bypass surgery. A half-dozen reporters and a couple of TV crews were camped outside.

Starved of any actual news, some journalists could be heard phoning imaginary, but not unbelievable, details back to their news desks. "Doctors say Jimmy is on the road to recovery, he's asking for cigars and squeezing nurses' bottoms..."

When Savile died late last year, many of those memories came flooding back. I got back in touch with my old Savile Day pals and we swapped photographs of ourselves goofing about with our wigs and cigars. We talked about how odd he was — but there was a sense of affection we shared with millions of others in the UK.

The sex scandal that has emerged over the past few weeks has transformed that affection into disgust. Crimes that were clearly horrific have been rendered even more so because Savile let us all down so badly.

But it’s worse than that. The rumors, innuendos and jokes show that we suspected all along, but had invested too much emotion in our cherished uncle Jimmy to do anything more than laugh it off. That makes the truth so much harder to bear.

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »




Chinese Police Discover 10,000 Bottles Of Red Wine In An Abandoned House

$
0
0

LafiteSome 10,000 bottles of Chateau Lafite Rothschild red wine has been found in a derelict house in China.

Police are yet to determine whether the wine - one of the most expensive reds in the world - is fake or genuine but if they are the real they could be worth up to £10 million ($16 million).

The home owner, who goes by the name of Zou, told police his house has been empty for nine years and he knew nothing about the potentially valuable find.

However, as there are only 50,000 bottles of genuine Chateau Lafite Rothschild imported into China each year, police believe it may be a fake stash and are now searching for the illicit workshop where it may have been produced.

As of March, Chateau Lafite Rothschild has won six lawsuits against Chinese companies over fake wine and was awarded at least £80,000 in compensation.

Chateau Lafite Rothschild is a wine estate in France, owned by members of the Rothschild family since the 19th century.

Please follow The Life on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



S&P Ratings Suffered A Critical Defeat This Week In Australian Courts

$
0
0

standard and poor's, standard & poor,

PROTESTING that only fools would rely on your product to make investment decisions may seem a dangerous argument to make. Yet it is one that has served credit-ratings agencies well over the years, allowing them to sell ratings to debt issuers while abjuring legal responsibility for the quality of their work. A ruling by an Australian court this week, however, has raised questions for the industry about its immunity from prosecution.

The ruling in the Federal Court of Australia on November 5th held Standard & Poor's (S&P) jointly liable with ABN AMRO, a bank, for the losses suffered by local councils that had invested in credit derivatives that were designed to pay a high rate of interest yet were also meant to be very safe. The derivatives in question were "constant proportion debt obligations" (CPDOs). These instruments make even the most ardent fans of complex financial engineering blush: they are designed to add leverage when they take losses in order to make up the shortfall. S&P's models, which the court said blindly adopted inputs provided by ABN AMRO, gave the notes a AAA rating, judging they had about as much chance of going bust as the American government.

S&P denies that its ratings were inappropriate, and plans to appeal. But evidence before the court suggests a world of harried analysts being outsmarted by spivvy bankers. It also indicated a disturbing lack of curiosity by S&P analysts and a desire to cover up for the firm's failings even when they fretted about a "crisis in CPDO land" and worried that some buyers of these products were "in no hurry to stay in front of the truck". Instead of warning investors that it had made mistakes, the court found that the firm continued to provide glowing opinions on new CPDOs coming out of the ABN AMRO factory.

There is nothing in the ruling to suggest the shoddy behaviour that took place in this instance was widespread across the firm. It would be a mistake to attribute all ratings that subsequently turn out to be wrong to negligence. Making predictions is hard, as Yogi Berra, a famously quotable baseball player, noted, especially when they are about the future.

But the Australian case does challenge a central part of the defence proffered by S&P and other ratings agencies (Moody's and Fitch are the other two big ones) in some 40 ongoing cases worldwide alleging negligence. They argue that ratings are merely opinions and protected by constitutional safeguards on free speech, and that only imprudent investors would take decisions solely based on them.

This defence has already worked in a number of high-profile cases in America. Investment analysts and lawyers reckon that there is no sign that courts elsewhere are likely to follow the Australian ruling; it may not even survive the appeal. But the reasoning in the Australian case is persuasive. The judge argued that agencies could not wash their hands of all responsibility if investors took their ratings at face value and then lost money. "The issuer of the product is willing to pay for the rating not because it may be used by participants and others interested in financial markets for a whole range of purposes but because the rating will be highly material to the decision of potential investors to invest or not," the judge wrote.

The tendency of investors to rely on ratings is reinforced by the privileged access that agencies have to information about issuers. The agencies' defence that theirs is just an opinion wears thin when, having looked under the hood and kicked the tyres, they then tell investors to make up their own mind from a distance. It would help if regulators forced issuers of bonds and other rated securities to provide more public information. That would allow investors to do more of their own due diligence and enable more competition between agencies to provide the best analysis to investors rather than the best service to issuers.

Click here to subscribe to The Economist

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Canada's Highest Court Says Pfizer's Viagra Patent Is No Good

$
0
0

pfizer viagra

Canada's top court on Thursday stripped Pfizer of its patent for Viagra, saying the pharmaceutical giant failed in the patent to identify the active compound in the drug.

"Patent 2,163,446 is void," the Supreme Court said in its ruling.

The court explained that under Canadian patent rules an inventor must "properly disclose the invention and how it works" in order to be granted "exclusive monopoly rights" for it.

It concluded that Pfizer knew and did not properly disclose that sildenafil is the only compound in Viagra, out of several listed compounds, that induces penile erection in impotent males.

"The patent system is based on a 'bargain,' or quid pro quo: the inventor is granted exclusive rights in a new and useful invention for a limited period in exchange for disclosure of the invention so that society can benefit from this knowledge," the court said.

"If there is no proper disclosure, then there can be no exclusive monopoly rights."

Generic pharmaceutical company Teva brought the suit against Pfizer hoping to produce a generic version of Viagra before Pfizer's patent was due to expire in 2014.

The high court noted Pfizer had conducted tests proving sildenafil was the key to treating erectile dysfunction, and so concluded that "the invention was the use of sildenafil for the treatment of ED."

But Pfizer's patent only states that "one of the compounds (in Viagra) induces penile erection in impotent males, without specifying which is the effective compound."

Teva said in a statement it would soon start producing a generic version of the drug that will be "priced significantly lower than Viagra," which will result in "millions in savings to consumers" and "make this medication accessible to people who might otherwise not have been able to afford it."

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



How The Mafia Is Taking Over Montreal

$
0
0

Mayor Montreal Gerald Tremblay

TORONTO, Canada — In the back room of the Cosenza Social Club, a strip mall café in an Italian neighborhood of Montreal, the city’s top mobster held court over piles of cash.

Hours of surveillance video captured by the RCMP, Canada’s national police, show the since-assassinated godfather of Montreal’s powerful Mafia, Nicolo Rizzuto, in variations of the same scene: counting bills, pausing only to lick his fingers, and stuffing the bundles in his knee-high socks. 

No one is surprised that the mob conducts its illegal activities in cash. Shocking many, however, are revelations about the source of the money — a Mafia-controlled scheme that rigged bids and dispensed bribes on Montreal public construction contracts.

The scam, revealed in an ongoing corruption inquiry in Montreal, added an estimated 30 percent to the cost of municipal construction projects in Canada’s second-largest city — a corruption tax paid, in the end, by the city’s taxpayers.

The scheme reached deep inside city hall, and on Monday night it led to the downfall of Montreal’s long-serving mayor, Gerald Tremblay. He announced his resignation while insisting he would eventually be cleared of wrongdoing, and blaming the scandal on political allies and close associates.

“The trust I had in some was inevitably betrayed. I assume the full responsibility,” Tremblay said in a brief speech at city hall. “I now must suffer an unbearable injustice. I never thought my life would be subjected to such a fury in a society of law and justice. But one day, justice will prevail.”

Tremblay, 70, is resigning a year before the end of his third mandate. He likely won’t be the last politician in the French-speaking province of Quebec to see his career cut short by the widening scandal over the awarding of public works contracts. The corruption inquiry, appointed by the provincial government, has already raised suspicions about other mayors and senior politicians with the provincial Liberal Party.

The RCMP captured the café videos with hidden cameras during 2004 and 2005. They show a stream of bosses from major construction firms paying homage to Mafia boss Rizzuto, some by handing over wads of cash.

To the incredulity of many, the RCMP sat on the evidence. It was investigating the Rizzuto clan’s drug-smuggling operations and considered the construction fraud “non-pertinent.” The videos came to light when the corruption inquiry began its work last month and demanded they be introduced as evidence.

The most explosive testimony has come from Lino Zambito, one of the construction bosses seen in the café videos. He said construction firms paid 2.5 percent of the value of city contracts to Rizzuto and 3 percent to Union Montreal, the ruling municipal party headed by Tremblay.

“Yes, entrepreneurs ran a system that wasn’t legal, but I can assure you that at other levels there were politicians who were aware of what was going on,” testified Zambito, who faces criminal charges involving a municipal contract.

Captured on video visiting Rizzuto in the café are representatives of at least eight of the biggest companies dealing with the Montreal. These firms received $500 million worth of city contracts between 2006 and 2009.

City hall has responded to the bombshell accusations by suspending all non-emergency contracts for roads, waterworks and sewers. Tremblay, a former provincial cabinet minister with the Liberal Party, initially insisted he wouldn’t resign.

He acknowledged hearing “rumors,” shortly after he became mayor, of rampant corruption in the Union Montreal party he leads and in city hall’s bureaucracy. He says party officials repeatedly assured him there was no truth to them. But evidence before the inquiry suggests that, at the very least, the mayor may have been willfully blind. The rot was extensive.

A top city hall engineer has admitted to taking almost $600,000 in kickbacks from construction companies. And the city’s former manager has been accused of pocketed $300,000 in bribes.

The inquiry has also heard of at least $500,000 in bribes to Tremblay’s former right-hand man, Frank Zampino, who headed city hall’s executive committee until he resigned from politics in 2008. He was arrested earlier this year and faces fraud charges.

None of the accusations heard at the inquiry have been proven in court.

The most damaging testimony against the mayor came on Oct. 29. A former political organizer for the mayor’s party, Martin Dumont, testified he was called one day into the office of Bernard Trepanier, the Union Montreal fundraising official known in the construction industry as “Mr. Three Percent” — the kickback he allegedly would collect for the mayor’s party. Trepanier wanted Dumont’s help to close a safe bursting with cash. It took both men to force the door shut, Dumont said.

Dumont was chief organizer in Union Montreal’s 2002 attempt to win two municipal seats, vacated when two Union Montreal city councilors resigned after admitting to taking bribes from developers. During a fundraiser for the election campaign, Dumont said he was led to the bathroom by Nicolo Milioto, accused during the inquiry of being the middleman between the construction industry and the Rizzuto clan.

Dumont said Milioto told him to stand next to him at the urinal and then handed him an envelope stuffed with $10,000.

At one point, Dumont became concerned the party would surpass the legal spending limit of $46,000 for the election. At a meeting that included Tremblay, Dumont said the party’s chief financial officer showed him two columns, one with an “official budget” of $43,000 and another with an “unofficial budget” of $90,000. At that point, Tremblay left the room saying, “I don’t want to know about that,” Dumont testified.

Dumont had trouble explaining why he never told police about the corruption he said he witnessed. He claimed he assumed no one would believe him. He went on to become a policy adviser to Prime Minister Stephen Harper and three federal cabinet ministers with Harper’s ruling Conservative Party.

Tremblay calls Dumont’s testimony “completely false.”  

The litany of corruption accusations comes with the city braced for a potential mob war.

Last month, Vito Rizzuto, long known as the “Teflon Don,” was released from a US penitentiary after serving five years for his involvement in a 1981 triple murder. He returned to Canada, and observers fear he’s bent on revenge.

The last major mob war Montreal witnessed was in the 1970s and 80s, when the Sicilian and Calabrese factions fought for supremacy. The Sicilian Rizzutos emerged the undisputed kingpins, but their 30-year reign weakened when both Vito and his father, Nicolo, were sent to prison.

In 2009, Vito’s son, Nick Jr., was gunned down on a Montreal street in broad daylight. In May 2010, Vito’s brother-in-law, reportedly the family’s “consigliere,” was kidnapped and is still missing. And in December that year, Vito’s father, Nicolo, the cash-stuffing Mafia patriarch, was killed by a sniper’s bullet while sitting at supper in his Montreal home.

On Monday, police announced that a high-level mobster, Joe Di Maulo, was gunned down in front of his home in a Montreal suburb. Di Maulo, 70, had long been a loyal member of the Calabrese clan before getting close to the Rizzutos after the Sicilians won the war. Montreal’s La Presse newspaper described him as a player in the Mafia power struggle, but it’s unclear what side he was on.

The months ahead look like they’ll be bloody ones, politically and literally. 

Please follow Business Insider on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



New Jersey Businesses Are Getting Sued Today Over Hurricane Sandy

$
0
0

gas, shortage, lines, long, waiting, prices, aftermath, new jersey, sky, american flag, sandy, nj, 2012, bi, dngThe state of New Jersey will file the first law suits today against eight businesses that allegedly engaged in price gouging in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy.

New Jersey Attorney General Jeffrey Chiesa will identify the eight businesses — among them include gas stations and a lodging provider — at a press conference later today, NBC New York reports. 

State law defines price gouging as "increases of 10 percent or more during a state of emergency and for a 30-day period afterward," according to the AP.

The New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs says it has received nearly 2,000 complaints from consumers regarding alleged storm-related price gouging, and has since served approximately 170 subpoenas.     

UPDATE: The following businesses have been accused of unlawful price gouging by the state of New Jersey:

  • Kistruga, Inc., d/b/a Lukoil station, at 253 McBride Avenue, Paterson.  
  • C.S. George & Sons, Inc., d/b/a George's Gulf station, at 387 Crooks Avenue, Clifton 
  • Alen Service Corp., d/b/a Lukoil station, at 335 McCarter Highway, Newark
  • Vinny Fuel Corporation, d/b/a Delta Gas station, at 141 Bloomfield Avenue, Bloomfield.
  • Perth Amboy NJPO, LLC, d/b/a BP station at 163 Fayette Street, Perth Amboy.
  • S&D LLC,d/b/a Exxon station, at 555 Riverside Avenue, Lyndhurst.
  • Couto & Sons, Inc. d/b/a Sunoco station, at 69 Wilson Avenue, Newark.
  • Ratan Hospitality Group, LLC, d/b/a Howard Johnson Express at 625 Route 46 East, Parsippany.

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



New York And New Jersey Might Be Struggling After Sandy But Law Firms Are Doing Just Fine

$
0
0

lawyer with kid judge

Parts of New York and New Jersey are still dealing with flooding, power outages, and a whole host of other problems, but recovery efforts are flourishing at area law firms.

In a recent query about how they were affected by Hurricane Sandy, Above The Law discovered 71 percent of those surveyed felt their firm or law school was "highly" or "adequately" prepared for the storm.

And a whopping 74 percent revealed their organizations are back to working at pre-Sandy levels.

Those positive numbers have to come as a relief after dismal employment statistics revealed the industry saw little to no growth last quarter and has been stagnant for some time.

DON'T MISS: New Law School Ranking Totally Upends The Old List >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



A Suspect In The Romney Blackmail Investigation Was Identified Using This Cat Picture

$
0
0

romney tax return cats

A Tennessee man accused of stealing Mitt Romney's tax returns to blackmail him says two grainy pictures of cats led federal agents to him.

Back in September a group of hackers claimed it had stolen Mitt Romney's tax returns from PriceWaterhouseCoopers' offices in Franklin, Tenn. Someone then mailed a thumb drive to Romney's accounting office demanding $1 million in exchange for the documents.

And on Sept. 14, authorities thought they found their guy when they showed up at Michael Brown's house at 6:14 a.m., WSMV reported Monday.

"They said they're here to serve a search warrant for Romney's tax returns," Brown told the TV station. "My first reaction was, 'You've got to be kidding me.'"

The feds said they suspected Brown after discovering two grainy, black-and-white pictures of cats that believe belong to Brown on the illicit thumb drive, according to Brown.

“They didn’t want to show anything to me," Brown told The Daily. "They did it to my wife. They said, ‘These are your cats.’ When she objected, they were like, ‘Yes, they are.’”

Agents even took pictures of Brown's cats to compare to the ones in the blackmail offer, according to Brown.

But Brown insists the cats in question aren't his and actually belong to a former client.

“My daughter did recognize one of the cats. They belonged to a friend of my wife,” Brown told The Daily.

This isn't the first time Brown has run into trouble with the feds.

The Secret Service raided his house in 2009 after someone stole encrypted customer information from a Farm Bureau website, according to WSMV.

No charges were ever brought in that case.

DON'T MISS: Teen Billionaire Jokes About Killing Obama On Social Media >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »




JOB OF THE WEEK: Director, Technical Operations At NBC Universal

Montana Voters Overwhelmingly Said That Corporations Aren't People

$
0
0

cylon

A whopping 75 percent of Montana's voters approved an initiative Tuesday stating corporations are not people.

Montana voters specifically said "corporations are not entitled to constitutional rights because they are not human beings," Courthouse News Service reported.

The measure was a stinging rebuke to the U.S. Supreme Court's June decision to do away with the state's campaign-finance limits.

In its June ruling, the Supreme Court essentially affirmed its divisive 2010 decision in Citizens United finding federal campaign finance limits interfered with corporations' "free speech" rights.

Montana's "corporations aren't people, too" measure orders its reps in Congress to propose a Constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United.

In reality, it's a huge long shot that the state's representatives will be able to amend the Constitution, Jess Bravin points out in the Wall Street Journal. For that to happen, two-thirds of lawmakers in both houses of Congress would have to sign off and then three-fourths of the states would have to adopt the change.

But the measure shows Montanans aren't just going to let Citizens United go.

Given the fact that Barack Obama just won the chance to make the Supreme Court more liberal, the justices might just pay attention to the state's little-noticed initiative.

SEE ALSO: Colorado Governor Seriously Doubts The Feds Will Let States Legalize Pot >

 

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



A Horrifying Day In The Life Of A Corporate Lawyer Mom (Who Just Quit)

$
0
0

woman silhouette shadow

The debate about women having it all — the enviable career and perfect home life — has raged on for decades.

In August, Anne-Marie Slaughter attacked the idea that women can have both in a widely circulated Atlantic piece, telling us "it's time to stop fooling ourselves."

And based on the unbelievably hectic schedule the Clifford Chance associate cites in her departure memo, we have to wonder if Slaughter has a point.

You can read her full email at Above The Law. First, here's the horrifying schedule:

image

Read the full email and discussion at Above The Law >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



ELON MUSK: 'If We Published Patents, It Would Be Farcical'

$
0
0

elon musk

The patent system has been getting a lot of heat lately, especially with the high-profile fight between Apple and Samsung.

Superhero entrepreneur Elon Musk just avoids patents altogether with his high-tech space venture SpaceX

You would think you'd want to protect your intellectual property when you're building complicated things like spaceships and innovating new technologies daily.

But Musk's decision actually makes total sense. Why is that? Musk explains in a recent interview with Chris Anderson at Wired:

"We have essentially no patents in SpaceX. Our primary long-term competition is in China," said Musk in the interview. "If we published patents, it would be farcical, because the Chinese would just use them as a recipe book."

There are plenty of big holes in patent law — especially international patent law. And in some cases, they're totally bypassed anyway.

Thus, Musk's only option is to go with the trade secret route. That should end up working for a company like SpaceX, but as patent fights ramp up, something has to be done.

Please follow War Room on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Trend Forecaster Gerald Celente Sues Google To Block His Obscene Impostors

$
0
0

Gerald Celente

Noted trend forecaster Gerald Celente sued Google this week for allegedly letting bloggers use his image in vulgar postings.

The blogs at issue have variations of Celente's name, including geraldcelente-blog.blogspot.com and geraldcelente-blog.blogspot.ca.Google acquired the company that runs that blog site in April 2011.

The blogs post vulgar phrases like "WAKE THE [F-] UP" along with Celente's image, according to court documents filed by Celente.

Bloggers also allegedly put anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic, and anti-Islamist words in Celente's mouth, causing him to fear for his own safety.

Celente – who credits himself with predicting and naming the current "Great Recession" – called the posts obvious attempts to impersonate him and make money off his image through "pay per click" ads.

"Despite Google's policy against impersonation, Google has refused to deactivate the infringing blogs or to otherwise take action," Celente claimed in a court document that also names bloggers as defendants.

Google declined to comment Friday.

SEE ALSO: Teen Billionaire Jokes About Killing Obama On Social Media >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



A Recipe For Law School Reform: Cutting Admissions By Half And Slashing Scholarships

$
0
0

Kyle McEntee on Bloomberg Law

The law school bubble is made up of three things — increasing tuition, decreasing salaries, and simply not enough law jobs available.

So, what has to be done to fix this?

Kyle McEntee, a law school grad and co-founder of Law School Transparency, tells Bloomberg Law's Lee Pacchia two things will have to happen:

• Law schools will have to cut enrollment by about 50 percent. McEntee says it will either be a few schools closing down altogether or all schools reducing their enrollment in proportion to their market power, or how well their grads fare in the real world.

Financial aid for law students needs to be limited in an effort to drive down the price of law school.

"If schools continue to have a blank check, they are going to continue raising their prices ... and students will get into lots of debt," McEntee says. 

What is needed then is some sort of reform to the Higher Education Act during its 2013 re-authorization that will curb law school financial aid, according to McEntee.

SEE ALSO:A Horrifying Day In The Life Of A Corporate Lawyer Mom (Who Just Quit) >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Mexico Charges 14 Federal Police Officers For Shooting Up CIA Vehicle

$
0
0

car bullets

Mexico has formally charged 14 federal police officers with attempted murder for shooting up a vehicle carrying two CIA agents and a Mexican Navy captain, Gabriel Stargardter of Reuters reports. 

On Aug. 24 the Mexican police on trucks mounted with guns approached an armored Toyota Land Cruiser with U.S. diplomatic license plates on a dirt road about 35 miles south of Mexico City and riddled the SUV with 152 bullets as it attempted to evade them and return to the main highway. 

The CIA employees were taken to a hospital after being shot—one in the leg and the other in the stomach and hand—while the Mexican Navy captain suffered light bruises.

A senior U.S. official previously said that the attack was an assassination attempt organized by a drug cartel. Prosecutors investigated whether the Beltran Layva cartel—which wasaligned with Mexico's most powerful cartel, Sinaloa, before 2008—ordered the hit.

Stargardter notes that Mexican officials had previously said the attackers used AK47s and were not wearing uniforms.

SEE ALSO: Mexican Official Accuses CIA Of 'Managing' Not 'Fighting' The Drug Trade >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »




Weed Legalization Could Set Off A Radical Chain Of Events In Latin America

$
0
0

drug war mexico

The top advisor to incoming Mexican president Peña Nieto said the world's first full legalization of marijuana in Colorado and Washington “changes the rules of the game” in the war on drugs, The Washington Post reports.

Mexican officials have called for a review of joint U.S.-Mexico drug policies because, as Mexican Congressman Manlio Fabio Beltrones pointed out, "the largest consumer in the world has liberalized its laws.”

Over the last six years Mexico has spent billions of dollars per year to combat drug trafficking only to see cartels become stronger and more than 100,000 Mexicans be killed.

We reported that U.S. voters may have won the Drug War on Tuesday because one or more states growing weed could meet most of domestic demand and sink cartel revenues, but Codirector of RAND Drug Policy Research Center Beau Kilmer reminded us that the U.S. government will have something to say about that.

"The scenario where a state or two ends up dominating all of the U.S. market, that requires some really big assumptions," Kilmer told BI. "I have a hard time imagining that the federal government and other states would let that happen."

Imminent resistance aside, the U.S. government may no longer be in the position to force its drug crusade on other countries. 

“What happened on Tuesday was a game changer," drug analyst Alejandro Hope from the Mexican Institute for Competitiveness told Time.“Now it would be very hard for the U.S. to tell people not to legalize marijuana.”

Even prior to Tuesday, prominent voices includingAmerica's closest South American allies, President Obama's drug czar Gil Kerlikowske, Former President of Mexico Vincente Fox, Prime Minister of Canada Stephen Harper, The Global Commission on Drug Policy and the Council on Hemispheric Affairs have stated thatthe U.S.-led drug policy of criminalizing drug use and employing military tactics to fight traffickers has been a failure.

So the U.S. government faces a dilemma: does it double down on a decades-long losing war or accept failure and rethink it's position on drugs, especially its extreme stance on marijuana?

One Mexican national-security expert estimated that the Sinaloa cartel, Mexico's oldest and most powerful, moves a kilo of cocaine over the U.S. border about every 10 minutes. Sinaloa has also been flooding key U.S. cities with heroin and methamphetamine.

And yet weed (along with heroin) is classified as a Schedule I substance—meaning that it has "no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the U.S."—while cocaine, along with meth, is a Schedule II substance.

Mexico may provide a solution by not cooperating with the U.S. drug crusade.

“Why are Mexican troops … searching for tunnels, patrolling the borders, when once [marijuana] reaches Colorado it becomes legal?" Jorge Castañe­da, a former foreign minister of Mexico and an advocate for ending what he calls an “absurd war,” told The Post.

The irony for the U.S. government is that Mexico, and the rest of the world, now has a U.S. precedent to cite when creating blueprints for a post-Drug War world.

Now we are not like madmen in the desert," Jorge Hernández, president of the Collective for an Integral Drug Policy and legalization advocate, told Time. "This transforms the debate.” 

SEE ALSO: Colorado And Washington Are The First Places In The World Where Weed Is Truly Legal >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Staten Island Residents Who Survived Sandy Might Wind Up In A Prison

$
0
0

arthur kill correctional facility

Staten Island has come up with a unique solution to combat its sudden wave of homelessness brought on by Hurricane Sandy.

But residents aren't too pleased.

Local officials are considering housing displaced residents in the Arthur Kill Correctional Facility, a medium-security prison that closed last year, Gothamist reported Friday.

But it will take some work to make the prison hospitable.

The boilers and other infrastructure was deactivated when the prison shut down and staff still has to inspect the building to make sure it can actually house people, Department of Corrections spokesman Peter Cutler told the New York Post.

It might be a roof over their heads, but displaced residents aren't exactly jumping for joy at the thought of spending time in the Big House.

“I lost everything, but I still have my pride. We don’t have to stay in a prison,” 44-year-old Wally Martinez told the Post. “My brother was once in that very prison, and my mother used to visit him regularly. She used to tell me how miserable he looked and how filthy and disgusting that prison was.”

DON'T MISS: Pot Legalization Changes Everything For Colorado And Washington Cops >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



The Supreme Court Is Going To Review A Major Part Of The Voting Rights Act

$
0
0

Supreme Court of U.S.

Despite lingering concerns over voter intimidation, the Supreme Court has decided it will review the Voting Rights Act, The Associated Press tweeted Friday afternoon.

Late last month the high court put off hearing challenges to the law, which requires states with a history of bias against minority voters to clear any changes to the voting process with the federal government.

However, the court has limited its review to one core question: Did Congress overreach its power when it renewed the act for the fourth time, SCOTUSblog reported.

Challengers claim the act exceeds powers granted to Congress by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth amendments and violates the Tenth Amendment — which protects states by limiting Congress' power.

Tuesday's election was complicated by numerous voting issues. In addition to long lines and problems with provisional ballots, voter ID laws across the country came under fire both before and on election day.

At least 23 states had adopted laws barring residents without state-issued IDs from voting, even if they're American citizens.

The high court flirted in 2009 with taking up the act but avoided issuing a ruling at the time, PBS reported last week.

But Chief Justice John Roberts hinted the act might soon expire, saying "we are now a very different nation" than we were in 1965 when the law was adopted.

“Whether conditions continue to justify such legislation is a difficult constitutional question we do not answer today," Roberts said in 2009.

DON'T MISS: Meet The Fascinating Spouses Behind The Nation's Supreme Court Justices >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



The Marijuana Business In Colorado Is Already Booming

$
0
0

marijuana

In the shadow of Colorado’s state capitol Dustin Avery is blissfully puffing away on a cannabis pipe. “It’s great, you can smoke a bong, the cops can ride by, and you just wave at them,” he says. “I can’t believe it. In Florida I got 10 days in jail just for having a pipe and no drugs.”

Mr Avery, 20, is standing in a civic square in central Denver, in a fog of smoke, and he is far from alone. At least half a dozen people nearby are openly taking their own drugs, and appear to be in various states of impairment as they revel in Colorado's new-found status as the “Amsterdam of America.”

It is just a few days since the people of the Centennial state voted, by a majority of 53-47, to legalise cannabis for recreational use and put a sales tax on it. Along with Washington state they were the first in the US to do so.

Colorado also went further than both Washington and Amsterdam, allowing its citizens to cultivate up to six cannabis plants in their homes. “I’ll be growing all six, and possibly some more,” Mr Avery added.

It is no coincidence that, a few blocks from where he stood, the 2012 National Marijuana Business Conference was taking place. The event attracted entrepreneurs, some in sharp suits and ties and clutching iPhones, looking to be part of an anticipated “green rush.” As they networked lawyers, bankers, accountants, insurance agents, lobbyists and potential investors discussed not their favourite types of “bud,” but issues such as how to get funds for cannabis start ups, taxation, and listing businesses on iPad applications.

Tripp Keber, managing director of Dixie Elixers and Edibles, which already supplies items like cannabis-infused sodas and mints to hundreds of medical cannabis dispensaries in Colorado, said: “On Nov 6 there were 105,000 registered medical patients in Colorado. From Nov 7 we’re talking about an addressable market of one million plus customers. This is explosive, hockey stick growth, a watershed moment. It’s also a boon for taxes and jobs, and the US economy needs tax dollars.

“I don’t have a crystal ball but I think in the next two years we’ll probably have initiatives like this in five other states.”

Another cannabis entrepreneur, Vicki Garland, 61, owner of Lotus Heart Apothecary, began her business making soothing lotions and sprays. Several years ago she started infusing them with the drug and selling to registered medical patients.

She said: “It’s changed my life. It’s been so rewarding to help cancer patients. Now there’s a big boom to come, and we’re reeling to think what effect this is going to have.

“We just hope that President Obama gets the DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency) to leave us alone. It’s time.”

Her daughter Charity Garland, 26, is a stellar example of the rising class of cannabis entrepreneur. In December Miss Garland finishes her chemistry degree at Berkeley. Instead of pursuing her initial goal of becoming a Nasa scientist, she will bake and sell cannabis products like croissants, brioche and gingerbread cupcakes.

“It’s all chemistry,” she explained. “I decided to do something a little different and creative.”

The medical cannabis boom has already seen hundreds of dispensaries sprout up in Colorado, surpassing the number of Starbucks outlets.

In an area known as the “Green Mile,” Allie Priestley, 24, a professional “budtender,” was surrounded by jars of produce with names like “Sugarberry Sativa” and “Golden Goat.” Her dizzying array of cannabis-infused products included chocolate chip cookies, peanut butter and jelly cups, and gluten free granola bars.

“Our most popular product is pink kush,” she said enthusiastically. “It’s perfect for daytime use for people with anxiety. It doesn’t put you out of it, so you can function at work.

“We also have these great new mint chocolate bars. You can’t taste the marijuana at all. They’re perfect if you can’t smoke during the day because you have kids.”

The morning after the legalisation vote Mr Brodeur had 30 calls in an hour from people in states like Texas, New York and Massachusetts “wanting to make vacation plans.” He said: “I’ve been waiting for this my whole adult life and it’s not about the business.”

Whether Colorado does in fact implement the legalisation of cannabis is somewhat of a moot point. Its stance has set up a potential head-on collision with the federal US government. Under federal law the possession and sale of the drug remains illegal.

The Department of Justice could go to court and torpedo the state’s plans, or there could be raids by the DEA. A spokesman for the US Attorney’s office said: “Enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act remains unchanged.” But in the absence of imminent federal action the election day referendum is expected to be certified by Governor John Hickenlooper in 30 days time.

Mr Hickenlooper, a Democrat, had been a vocal opponent of legalisation but says he will “respect the will” of the voters.

That will make possession of an ounce of the drug, and plant growing, legal. In January state politicians will begin working towards licensing shops 12 months later. The shops will be able to sell up to an ounce, and it is expected they will pay millions of dollars in state tax.

At one Denver outlet Mike Brodeur, 48, offers cannabis butter and olive oil, healing pistachio pudding, pumpkin pie high tea, bath salts and massage oil. His biggest seller is candied apples. “They’re just awesome,” he said.

“They actually have an apple in there which is cool.”

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Con Artists Are Selling Fake iPads In Texas -- Again

$
0
0

A con artist recently duped an Arlington woman into shelling out $200 for what she thought was a new iPad worth $800.

What she really bought was a mirror covered in duct tape. Not to mention a Fed Ex box, if that's any consolation.

NBC 5 in Dallas-Fort Worth reported that the con artist approached the woman in a gas station, where he offered to sell her "iPads and stuff," including laptops. She took the bait on the fake iPad and is now down $200.

This same type of scam actually happened around the same time last year, when con artists trolled the North  Texas area selling purported iPads and Macbooks, which turned out to be painted blocks of wood or paper notebooks.

Moral of the story: don't buy iPads on the street -- or laptops for that matter.

Watch NBC 5's story on the iPad mirror below:

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Viewing all 92742 articles
Browse latest View live