Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 92842 articles
Browse latest View live

Thieves Paid Entrance Fee Before Allegedly Stealing $3 Million Worth Of Art From A South African Museum

$
0
0

pretoria art museumThieves entered a South African art gallery as paying visitors before holding staff up at gunpoint and producing a "shopping list" of paintings they wanted totalling R27m (£2 million) in value.

The heist saw the three men make off with five paintings by local masters Irma Stern, Gerard Sekoto, JH Pierneef, Maggie Laubser and Hugo Naude, worth R15m, from the Pretoria Art Museum.

They left a sixth painting that had been on their list, Irma Stern's "Two Malay Musicians", valued at R12 million, on the pavement outside the gallery, apparently because they couldn't fit it in their getaway car, a silver Toyota Avanza.

The thieves are said by police to have all paid the R20 (£1.44) entrance fee to enter the capital's art gallery and waited until other visitors had left before launching their raid.

Daywood Khans, a member of staff at the gallery, told local radio station Eye Witness News (EWN) that the men pointed a gun at him and produced a "shopping list" of artworks.

"They pulled out a list and said they were looking for so-and-so painting which is among our old masterpieces," he said.

"They left one of the paintings behind when it did not fit into their getaway car." Stephen Welz, an art expert, told the Pretoria News newspaper that he was puzzled by the theft, as such famous works of art were so well documented that it was nearly impossible to sell them, locally or abroad.

SEE ALSO: Watch A Guy With No Talent Make $1 Million Selling Contemporary Art

Please follow The Life on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »




Why Veterans Like Anthony Smalls End Up In Prison

$
0
0

anthony smalls inmate

Anthony Smalls never knew life after the Navy could be harder than life in it.

Smalls served in the United States Submarine Service from 1981 through 1996.

But by the next year, after months of unemployment, he was behind bars.

Smalls felt unprepared for life outside the military. The government kicks soldiers out of the armed services with no income, causing them to turn to lives of drugs, alcohol, and crime, which effectively upsets the rest of their lives, he said.

A few months later he was convicted of armed robbery.

Smalls spent the next nine and a half years in various prisons before being released in 2006.

Then it was really hard to get a job.

"It is hard when you first come home from prison," Smalls, 51, said.

In a bid to turn his life around, Smalls earned his master's degree in social work in 2011 from Fordham University in New York and set out to help veterans before they found themselves in the same situation he had been in.

"I felt I could help veterans such as myself come home and readjust so they don't make the same mistakes," Smalls said.

Finally Smalls scored a job with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. From his own experience he concluded that the VA could be much more effective.

Everyone in administration at the VA isn't actually a veteran, so they aren't able to connect with their clients or figure out ways to help them, according to Smalls.

"I think education is the key," he said of how to keep vets out of prison. "We need to convert the jobs that they were doing in the military over to civilian jobs."

DON'T MISS: This Sex Criminal Fled To Mexico Because Life Was Too Hard In The US >

 

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



REPORT: John McAfee, The Antivirus Software Inventor, Is Wanted For Murder (INTC)

$
0
0

John McAfee

Gizmodo reports that John McAfee is wanted for murder.

McAfee got rich developing antivirus software back in the eighties.

The company named after him, McAfee, Inc, sold to Intel for $7 billion in 2010.

Gizmodo also reports that McAfee has been living in Belize for a while now, spending most of his time there experimenting with drugs.

Today, Gizmodo says he's wanted for murder:

Antivirus pioneer John McAfee is on the run from murder charges, Belize police say. According to Marco Vidal, head of the national police force's Gang Suppression Unit, McAfee is a prime suspect in the murder of American expatriate Gregory Paul, who was gunned down Saturday night at his home in San Pedro Town on the island of Ambergris Caye.

Details remain sketchy so far, but residents say that Paul was a well-liked builder who hailed originally from California. The two men had been at odds for some time. Last Wednesday, Paul filed a formal complaint against McAfee with the mayor's office, asserting that McAfee had fired off guns and exhibited "roguish behavior." Their final disagreement apparently involved dogs.

Continue reading at Gizmodo >

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Heartbreaking Story Of A Teenager's Murder Shows Just How Corrupt Honduras Is

$
0
0

wilfredo yanes honduras

TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras (AP) — In a capital so dangerous that only the "walking dead" are said to venture out after dark, nothing could draw an obedient son from the safety of his parents' suburban home into the deserted night.

Nothing, that is, but a girl.

Ebed Yanes had friended her on Facebook. They had chatted and the studious 15-year-old was desperate to meet her. "My parents are still awake," he wrote her that Saturday night in May. "I'll shower while they go to bed and I'll get the keys to the motorcycle."

What do homicide statistics mean to a high school freshman in the grip of a young crush? A murder rate of 91 per 100,000 residents may make Honduras the most violent country in the world, but to Ebed those odds weren't grim enough to keep him home.

He crept downstairs, climbed onto his father's motorcycle and disappeared into the dark in search of the girl.

He never found her. "I don't know where you are," he texted. "I've been looking for 45 minutes but now I better get back before the soldiers catch me."

Police are so chronically outgunned by the criminals that the government had declared a state of emergency, allowing the army to patrol the streets. At this late hour, soldiers would have set up a roadblock. Ebed wasn't carrying the motorcycle registration, and he didn't want to be stopped, caught sneaking out of the house despite everything his father had taught him.

Honduras is a broken country. The political system is so weak that just three years ago the president was ousted in a coup carried out by the army and endorsed by the Supreme Court. Poverty is second only to Haiti's in the Western Hemisphere. An estimated three quarters of the cocaine flown from South America to the United States passes through this Central American country, the epicenter of the U.S. government's war on drug trafficking. The violence, according to the World Health Organization, is "epidemic."

Ebed knew he lived in a perilous country. But there was this lovely girl, and he so wanted to meet her. It was just one night. It was spring. He was young.

And by 1:30 a.m., he was dead, slumped over his father's motorcycle with a bullet to the back of his head.

____

The Yanes family lives in a secure gated community on the outskirts of Tegucigalpa. Every Sunday, before going to church, Ebed's job was to wash the car for his father, an organic food supplier.

But that Sunday, Wilfredo Yanes, 57, noticed that his car was still dirty. Ebed was not in bed, nor anywhere to be found. The motorcycle was missing.

Wilfredo's boy was playful, fond of girls, easily distracted, but he did not get into trouble. He never left the house alone, had never taken public transportation and didn't know his way about the city. Even when he went to Tae Kwon Do lessons, his older sister waited for him in the car for two hours, studying for her medical school classes.

It was hard to imagine what could have happened to him.

Wilfredo called the front gate of the complex. Yes, he was told, Ebed had left near midnight, on the motorcycle. No, he had not come back.

"We need to stay calm," Wilfredo told his wife, Berlin Caceres, 42, a university professor. They would look for him.

They went first to the Criminal Investigations Division, where they filed a missing person report. Next they went to the Juvenile Justice Division, then to the Children's Hospital. Maybe Ebed had had a motorcycle accident or had stayed overnight at a girl's house — though he'd never done anything like that before. Maybe he would come home, apologizing sheepishly.

He wasn't in jail or at the hospital. Finally, the Yaneses went to the police homicide division. The officers knew nothing about his son, they told him, but they did find a motorcycle next to the body of an unidentified young man. There had been a party in the neighborhood, they said, and somebody from the party must have killed him.

"We have the motorcycle here. Do you want to see it?"

The family walked across a parking lot and from a distance Wilfredo recognized his red motorcycle. He knew what it meant.

"Is it him?" asked his wife.

"Yes, it's him," Wilfredo said. She fainted and he barely had time to catch her before she hit the ground.

At the city morgue, Wilfredo told his wife and daughter to wait outside. Beyond the bare reception area the morgue was full, well past its 45-cadaver capacity, and nearly a dozen bodies lay on the floor, each in a white plastic bag. That's where Wilfredo found his only son, with a broken jaw that hadn't even seen its first shave, and an exit wound next to his mouth.

As shock set in, they handed him a bag of Ebed's belongings: his BlackBerry, a broken helmet, a set of house keys.

That night, at the wake, Wilfredo stood before the family and friends who'd gathered to pray and made a promise for Ebed, and for his country too. Although deeply religious, he did not believe in leaving this horror in God's hands. God rewarded you for what you did in this life, and he had to take action. "My son will not be just one more statistic," he vowed.

Wilfredo kept thinking about what the police had told him. His son was the victim of a street crime? He didn't believe it. On his way to the funeral, he took a detour to the police station a block away from where his son had been found. Two policemen on duty told him they had heard shots late Saturday, but they hadn't gone out to investigate. There were only the two of them, after all, and they were afraid.

He didn't blame the officers. Wilfredo didn't care for politics or criticize the government. But he was a practical man who knew police were unlikely to investigate, and without a case the government would never deliver justice. If he wanted answers, he'd have to get them himself. He climbed back into his car and drove to the block where Ebed had died.

One neighbor, a woman, said she'd heard loud gunshots, three rounds from a large caliber gun, but had been too scared to look outside. A young man who rented an apartment nearby did look, and he told Wilfredo he had seen six to eight masked soldiers in dark uniforms approaching a body. They poked it with their rifles, then picked up the empty bullet casings and went back to their vehicle parked at the entrance of the alleyway. It was an unusually big pickup truck, a four-by-four, with a double cabin.

After the sun came up, residents said, they went outside and gathered the bullet casings that the soldiers had failed to find. They gave them to Wilfredo, who carried them to his son's funeral, feeling the weight of their significance in his pocket and in his gut: Good God, he thought, his son wasn't killed by party-goers. He likely was shot by the army.

____

After the funeral, Wilfredo drove to National University, where his wife worked, to see Julieta Castellanos, the president of the university. She had also lost a son, shot by police at a roadblock last year, and had become a fearless critic of police impunity. Her advice: gather evidence and then contact the prosecutor's office.

Days later, Wilfredo and his wife took a drive through the hilly outskirts of the capital, past the sleazy love motels and run-down auto shops, looking for a vehicle that fit the description given by the witnesses. On their third trip, around midnight on Saturday, they stumbled upon an army checkpoint near the alley where their son was killed.

The vehicle matched. It was a bulky Ford pickup. Four-door. A rare sight in Tegucigalpa.

Wilfredo's wife stopped the car, and he quickly snapped a photograph, not thinking about the flash. Soldiers walked over and told him to turn over his camera.

Wilfredo was terrified, but thought fast. "It's my hobby to collect photos of unusual vehicles," he told them. They let him go with a warning.

It had been a week since his son's death on May 26, but Wilfredo already had witnesses, two bullet casings and a photo of the vehicle.

He had a case.

____

On Monday morning, Wilfredo filed a complaint, sitting down in the office of the head prosecutor, German Enamorado, instead of waiting for a call. He wanted answers.

Enamorado was impressed by Wilfredo, and if it was true that soldiers had shot and killed a high school student, well, that was abominable. Enamorado assigned two prosecutors to the case that same day.

The prosecutors, however, did not have a car. The state prosecutor's office was a crowded cluster of desks and columns of stacked files. There were six prosecutors, a staff of investigators, and one car for the lot of them.

Wilfredo offered to drive.

The first stop was at army headquarters to collect the incident report for that night. After several failed attempts, an officer told them they had to file a request in writing. Two days later, they got it.

The army's report for the night of May 26 said a man on a motorcycle fired on the soldiers at the checkpoint, but got away when the soldiers pursued him. Wilfredo's son was armed only with a cellphone.

Next stop: ballistics. They asked for all the weapons from the unit that had been at the roadblock.

And then came the chilling news. The soldiers were in a special forces unit of the army's 1st Battalion. The Ford was part of a batch donated by the U.S. government. The unit itself, because it used U.S. aid, had been trained by the U.S. and vetted to ensure the soldiers and leadership were not corrupt and complied with human rights laws.

In other words, these were Honduras's finest soldiers. And it seemed to Wilfredo that they had murdered his son.

The more Wilfredo learned, the angrier he became.

The army chief, Rene Osorio, told the press Ebed had failed to stop at an army checkpoint and deserved what he got.

"Everyone who does not stop at a military checkpoint is involved in something," Osorio said.

On June 7, Enamorado called in the soldiers, opening an investigative file that would swell to some 700 pages. None of the soldiers remembered a man on a motorcycle, they said. Nothing happened that night.

After the interview, though, one of the soldiers called his mother and told her a very different story, according to the investigative file. He had been ordered to lie about the shooting of the boy, he said. His mother called a lawyer, who advised them that it would be better to be a witness than a suspect. The soldier showed up at the prosecutor's office the next day with three others.

There had been 21 men at the military roadblock. Seven more in the Ford. The two bullets that killed Ebed came from the same weapon.

The boy, he said, did not stop at the checkpoint, but raced through it. They followed him in the Ford pickup, chasing him through the dark alleys for at least five minutes. The boy turned into an alley too narrow for the truck, so the driver stopped. The lieutenant sitting in the front passenger seat ordered the unit to open fire as he jumped out of the truck and started shooting. Two other soldiers got out and fired from 30 meters away, with soldier Eleazar Abimael Rodriguez dropping to his knee in the firing position, said the soldier, who is now a protected witness. The motorcyclist was shot.

After that, said the soldier, the unit alerted Col. Juan Giron and received instructions. "We were ordered to pick up the shell casings and we returned to the roadblock. He told us what we had to say... that we shouldn't say what happened," according to the investigative file.

Officers took the weapons the soldiers had used that night and exchanged them, to cover up the shooting, the soldiers said.

When Enamorado told Wilfredo what had happened, he was aghast.

"They used my son as target practice," he said.

The soldiers had a choice, Enamorado said. It was right to chase Ebed, to try to stop him, even to shoot into the air. But not at a fleeing suspect.

What happened next was a miracle of efficiency. Within 17 days of opening the case, three soldiers were arrested. The bullets were traced to Rodriguez, 22, who was charged with murder and imprisoned. The two others, including the officer who ordered the unit to shoot, were suspended from the army and released on bail awaiting trial, charged with covering up a crime and abuse of their office.

It was a triumph, of sorts, for Wilfredo. But not enough. The man who killed his son had only been following orders.

There were three officers involved in the alleged cover-up, Enamorado told Wilfredo. One told the soldiers to lie, another switched the weapons, and another who claimed he had never been informed of the shooting.

The lieutenant colonel who allegedly ordered the weapons exchanged, Reynel Funes, had been vetted by the U.S. government. In 2006, the U.S. paid for Funes to attend the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, Calif., where he earned a master's degree in defense analysis. Earlier he had received training at the then-School of the Americas in Ft. Benning, Georgia.

The military has denied any wrongdoing on the part of the officers.

"All this about lies and switching the weapons is a novel," said army spokesman Lt. Col. Jeremias Arevalo. "We have given the prosecutor everything he has requested from the first day."

"We are a responsible and serious armed force, and we are against impunity."

____

Wilfredo doesn't think so. After months of pushing, he persuaded the prosecutor two weeks ago to investigate the roles of the officers, and to figure out what happened with the guns used to shoot his son. He has petitioned the government to take the army off the streets through a constitutional amendment.

He prays his country will shake off years of corruption and dysfunction, that someday, people won't be afraid to leave their gated communities at night, and that a boy will be able to test the limits of freedom without fear for his life.

He prays he will not be killed for speaking out.

"I'm not only reacting to the impotence that my son's death made me feel," he said. "I can't allow for rights to be violated, and even less if it's my family's right to life."

____

Associated Press writer Martha Mendoza in Santa Cruz, California contributed to this report.

Please follow Business Insider on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Major Hillary Clinton Fundraiser Says Citizens United Doesn't Go Far Enough

$
0
0

hillary clinton pensive tbi

In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United that corporations can spend freely on political campaigns through independent groups such as "super PACS."

But it's still illegal for corporations to give directly to candidates.

William Danielczyk, who was indicted last year for allegedly funneling money to Hillary Clinton's campaigns, wants to change all that, Reuters' Allison Frankel reports.

The Innolog Holdings CEO recently petitioned the Supreme Court to end a ban on direct contributions to campaigns by corporations.

Danielczyk raised about $180,000 for Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign in 2008 and her 2006 Senate race. However, many of those checks came from Republicans he allegedly reimbursed, the Wall Street Journal has reported.

Now, he's arguing to the Supreme Court that the direct campaign donations that got him in trouble are essentially the same as the indirect donations allowed under Citizens United.

Frankel writes:

The bar on direct corporate giving was intended to prevent businesses from corrupting the political process, yet according to Danielczyk, the risk of corruption is no more severe through direct corporate contributions than it is through the independent expenditures (or gifts from wealthy individuals) that the Supreme Court sanctioned in Citizens United.

SEE ALSO: Montana Voters Overwhelmingly Said Corporations Aren't People >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Microsoft's Patent Fight With Motorola Could Help Others Avoid Patent Warfare

$
0
0

microsoft surface tablet

Microsoft will square off against Motorola Tuesday in a case that could determine how much companies can charge others for licensing industry standard technology, The Wall Street Journal reports.

Microsoft claims Motorola tried to charge it an unfair price for video streaming patents, while Motorola says it charges other companies a similar price.

The case could be a game changer because Motorola and Microsoft are trying to gain ground in the smartphone industry and have a lot of patents, the Journal pointed out.

Judge James Robart's decision in the case will clarify how industry standard technology is licensed, the Journal reported.

The opinion could be a blueprint for other companies that have licensing disputes, helping them avoid their own patent suits in the future.

Microsoft's battle against Motorola, now part of Google, isn't the only fight over so-called industry standard patents.

Apple also accused Motorola of price gouging over industry-standard video streaming and Wi-Fi patents, but Motorola was let off the hook when the suit was dismissed last week, according to CNET.

However, Google's troubles aren't over.

At the beginning of the month, the Federal Trade Commission staff recommended the agency to sue Google for trying to block competitors' access to industry-standard smartphone technology, Bloomberg reported.

SEE ALSO:Trend Forecaster Sues Google To Block His Obscene Impostors >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Google Will Have To Make A Deal If It Doesn't Want To Get Sued By The US

$
0
0

Google Sign

Google Inc. is being pressed by U.S. Federal Trade Commission Chairman Jonathan Leibowitz to make an offer to settle the agency’s antitrust investigation in the next few days or face a formal complaint, two people familiar with the situation said.

Google has been engaged in discussions with the agency for about two weeks and hasn’t put any remedy proposals on the table, said the people, who declined to be identified because the negotiations are private.

For almost 20 months, the FTC has been probing whether Mountain View, California-based Google is abusing its dominance of the Internet and it’s prepared to file a case against the operator of the world’s largest search engine if the company fails to make an acceptable settlement proposal, the people said.

The FTC has told Google it won’t accept a resolution short of a consent decree and is prepared to take action in the next week or two, one of the people said.

“We continue to work cooperatively with the Federal Trade Commission and are happy to answer any questions they may have,” Adam Kovacevich, a spokesman for Google, said in an e- mail.

FTC investigators have recommended the agency issue a complaint against Google for ranking its own services higher than those of competitors, for signing exclusive agreements to provide search services to online publishers and for making it difficult for advertisers to compare data about campaigns running on rival sites by Yahoo! Inc. and Microsoft Corp.’s Bing, people familiar with the investigation have said.

The staff has also recommended the agency issue a complaint against Google for misusing patent protections to bloc rivals’ smartphones from coming to market, the people have said.

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



UK Teen Arrested For Posting A Picture Of A Burning Poppy On Facebook

$
0
0

Poppy flower on soldier (canada)

Police in Kent will question a man on Monday after an image of a burning poppy was posted on Facebook alongside an offensive comment.

The 19-year-old from Aylesham, near Canterbury, was detained on Sunday night on suspicion of making malicious telecommunications, Kent Police said.

Officers were contacted by a member of the public at around 4pm on Sunday and alerted to the picture on the social networking site "which was reportedly accompanied by an offensive comment", the force said in a statement.

The man was held under the Malicious Communications Act and will be interviewed later.

His arrest sparked numerous comments on Twitter, with people discussing its implications for civil liberties.

David Allen Green, a journalist and lawyer for the New Statesman magazine, tweeting as Jack of Kent at @DavidAllenGreen, wrote: "What was the point of winning either World War if, in 2012, someone can be casually arrested by Kent Police for burning a poppy?"

Data analyst Adrian Short, tweeting at @adrianshort, wrote: "Burning poppies is grossly offensive. It should be widely frowned upon, harshly condemned and absolutely legal."

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »




Illegal Immigrants Are Lobbying To Win The Right To Practice Law In 50 States

$
0
0

SEIU International Immigration Immigrant USA work

A nonprofit group called the DREAM Bar Association is lobbying every state in the union to grant law licenses to undocumented immigrants.

The group wants all 50 states to enact laws allowing graduates of ABA-accredited schools to receive law licenses after they pass the bar – regardless of their immigration status.

"This is a fundamental question of fairness," Jose Magaña, president of the group, said in a written statement issued ahead of a Tuesday press conference.

The DREAM Bar Association filed friend-of-the-court briefs with state supreme courts in Florida and California, which are both weighing whether lawyers can practice if they were brought to the U.S. illegally as children.

The group takes its name from the bipartisan legislation that would provide a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.

SEE ALSO: Why You Might Actually Want To Get A Law Degree >

 

 

 

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



The Other Woman In The Petraeus Scandal Has Hired Some 'Very Expensive' Lawyers And Crisis PR People

$
0
0

jill kelley

Jill Kelley, the "other woman" in the scandal that cost CIA director David Petraeus his job, has lawyered up, reports Donna Leinwand Leger at USA Today.

Kelley, an "unpaid social liaison" at MacDill Air Force Base, has hired DC superlawyer Abbe Lowell and crisis PR person Judy Smith.

The Petraeus investigation was allegedly triggered by hostile emails from his biographer and mistress Paula Broadwell to Kelley. She felt like she was being harassed by Broadwell and reported the emails to the FBI.

John Cook at Gawker notes that this is some "very expensive firepower," considering that the FBI is no longer investigating and there aren't any criminal allegations being thrown around.

From Cook:

Even if Kelley simply found it prudent to keep a lawyer handy—why Lowell? It's like hiring David Boies because your friend got a speeding ticket. Lowell is the quintessential Washington power broker. He represented Clinton before the Senate during his impeachment trial. He specializes in disgraced political figures, including John Edwards. He's the kind of guy you hire when you're seriously ******.

As for Smith, she has represented big-name folks like Monica Lewinsky, Larry Craig, Michael Vick and Kobe Bryant.

Here's the statement Smith issued Sunday for the Kelleys:

"We and our family have been friends with General Petraeus and his family for over 5 years. We respect his and his family's privacy and want the same for us and our three children."

NOW SEE: Paula Broadwell Moonlighted As A Gun Model >

 

 

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Huge Crime Spree In Brazil's Largest City Leaves 140 Dead In Two Weeks

$
0
0

Sao Paulo

It was a more than typically murderous Saturday night in São Paulo: at 10pm, in the São Bernardo do Campo neighborhood, a motorcyclist rode up to a private home, killed two of the residents, then sped away. An hour or so later in a nearby district, police shot and killed two men in what they said was an exchange of fire. Elsewhere police found the body of a man with a bullet through his brain – one of 14 people murdered and 12 injured in this single night amid a rising wave of violence in Brazil's biggest city.

At least 140 people have been murdered in São Paulo over the past two weeks in an outbreak of violent crime that has prompted early school closures, a change of municipal bus routes and street demonstrations. In September 144 people were killed. The causes are manifold, but a major factor appears to be an undeclared war between the largest criminal militia and the police, which has led to drive-by shootings, ambushes and other killings.

After initially denying the link, officials from the public safety department told local newspapers at the weekend that many of the killings of police had been ordered by imprisoned leaders of the First Capital Command criminal group in reprisal for a crackdown on the drug trade.

Non-governmental organisations, however, say the responsibility also lies with militias formed by former and serving police officers, who are used to skimming profits off the drug trade. So far this year, 92 former and current police officers have been gunned down.

Last week state and federal police said they would combine forces to create a new intelligence agency to counter the resurgent threat posed by organized crime.

Police jitters were apparent on Friday night when an off-duty officer, Edcarlos Oliveira Lima, killed the driver and passenger of a car that swerved in front of him. He claimed to have seen a gun in the vehicle and feared he was being corralled for a possible hit. However, witnesses and the victims' families say he needlessly killed two innocents. Oliveira Lima is under investigation.

There were 982 murders in the first nine months of this year in São Paulo, according to data released by the public security department. This is up 10% on last year and higher than the total in Rio de Janeiro.

Five hundred angry and worried residents of Brasilândia – one of the worst-affected areas – took to the streets on Sunday morning, carrying white roses, wearing T-shirts printed with the faces of some of the victims and shouting for greater vigilance.

Schools and shops in some São Paulo districts closed early last week due to concerns about the rising risks. "In view of the wave of violence in the city's south zone, the school's directors decided to send staff and students home early so as to assure their safety," Eliane Valerio de Souza, administrative assistant at a professional training school, told the newspaper Folha de S Paulo.

Regional authorities have played down the violence. Governor Geraldo Alckmin said the crime rate in Greater São Paulo was on the wane.

However, he warned the problem would not go away unless the national government took firmer measures to control the influx of drugs and guns along Brazil's extensive borders.

Despite the recent killings, São Paulo state is by no means the most violent in Brazil when its huge population is taken into account. Last year, this commercial powerhouse saw 10.1 homicides per 100,000 inhabitants compared with 74.5 in the most murderous state, Alagoas.

Until recently, the dominance of the First Capital Command was credited as a factor in the relatively low crime rates that São Paulo has enjoyed for most of the past decade. While Rio has been riven by frequent violence between competing gangs of drug traffickers, the war for control has largely been won in the commercial hub. But police crackdowns in 2001 and 2006 have resulted in surges of violence.

• The picture on this article was changed on 11 November 2012 to replace an image showing police in Rio de Janeiro

This article originally appeared on guardian.co.uk

Please follow Business Insider on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Twitter Just Lured One Of Google's Top Legal Eagles Out Of Retirement

$
0
0

Nicole Wong

Twitter, whose ranks are already stuffed with former Googlers, has hired another one: Nicole Wong, who left the search engine last year after nearly eight years as Google's chief fighter against Internet censorship.

She's joining a legal department run by a former colleague, Alex Macgillivray, who left Google to join Twitter in 2009.

Twitter, like Google, has wrestled with issues of censorship. It recently instituted the ability to suppress posts broadcast on the information network country by country to comply with local laws while keeping information available where it's legal.

Besides her professional role, censorship appears to be an issue of personal concern to wong. Last year, Wong wrote on her Google+ page about an episode where a local transit agency attempted to suppress protesters' communications over smartphones: "Here's the thing about censorship: in this globally connected world, censorship is never local."

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



The Most Compelling Reason For Keeping The Electoral College

$
0
0

Voting

Every presidential election seems to prompt the question: what good is the Electoral College?

Well, there is at least one practical reason why the system should stay as it is, according to Judge Richard Posner.

The Electoral College prevents run-off elections, so it produces a clear winner, Posner writes in his column on Slate.com.

And he gives a good reason for that.

The current electoral system ensures we can still have a winner even if nobody gets the popular vote.

In 1968, for example, Nixon received only 43 percent of the popular vote, but won the election by getting 301 votes in the Electoral College, according to Posner.

Clinton did the same in 1992 — again winning only 43 percent of the popular vote, but winning 370 electoral votes.

The pressure for a run-off is reduced by the electoral college, which produces a clear winner, Posner argues.

Posner suggests this is a practical reason of course, rather than a liberal or conservative reason to keep the Electoral College in place.

"No form of representative democracy, as distinct from direct democracy, is or aspires to be perfectly democratic," he writes. "Certainly not our federal government."

To read Judge Posner's other arguments in defense of the Electoral College, check out Slate.com.

SEE ALSO: Chris Christie Said Nothing About A Massive Inmate Escape During Sandy >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



FBI Agent In Petraeus Case Removed After Allegedly Sending Shirtless Photos To The 'Other Woman' Jill Kelley

$
0
0

jill kelleyThe federal agent who launched the investigation that eventually led to the resignation of CIA director David Petraeus was taken off the case during the summer over concerns that he "might have grown obsessed with the matter," The Wall Street Journal reports.

The FBI agent began the inquiry on behalf of a friend, Jill Kelley, who reportedly received about a half a dozen hostile emails from Petraeus' mistress Paula Broadwell.

The agent referred the matter to a cyber crimes unit but was prohibited from any role in the investigation after the FBI found out that he sent shirtless photos of himself to Kelley, people familiar with the probe told The WSJ.

After being barred from the case, the agent contacted representative David Reichert (R-Wash.) out of concern that senior FBI officials were going to "sweep the matter under the rug," according to two officials familiar with the matter.

The WSJ also provides details about the emails sent from Broadwell to Kelley:

Ms. Broadwell allegedly used a variety of email addresses to send the harassing messages to Ms. Kelley, officials said.

One asked if Ms. Kelley's husband was aware of her actions, according to officials. In another, the anonymous writer claimed to have watched Ms. Kelley touching "him'' provocatively underneath a table, the officials said.

The new developments raise questions about how the FBI handled the case.

The unidentified agent is now under investigation by the internal affairs arm of the FBI, according to the WSJ.

SEE ALSO: The FBI Investigation Of Petraeus Started As One Agent's Favor For A Friend >

Please follow Business Insider on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



The FBI Just Raided Paula Broadwell's House!

$
0
0

paula broadwell home fbi

FBI spokeswoman Shelley Lynch tells CNN that FBI agents were at the North Carolina home of Paula Broadwell, the biographer and reported mistress of former CIA director David Petraeus. 

The scandal prompted Petraeus' resignation.

What were the agents doing at the Broadwell residence?

Well, the FBI has declined to say.

From WCNC:

FBI agents Monday evening entered her family’s Dilworth home and appeared to be searching both floors.

The four or five agents brought cardboard boxes used for carrying papers and were on both floors of the home.

And from the AP:

They walked through the open garage of Broadwell's house and knocked at a side door before entering the home. One person was taking photographs of the house and its garage as members of the news media watched.

CNN reports that they refused to speak to reporters when asked who they were.

Paula Broadwell, along with her husband and two kids, aren't at the house. They've been in hiding since the news broke last Friday.

The FBI took two computers and half dozen or so evidence boxes from Broadwell's home, along with "who knows how many photos," WCNC's Diane Gallagher reports.

NOW SEE: Paula Broadwell's Father: 'This Is About Something Else Entirely, And The Truth Will Come Out' >

Please follow Business Insider on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »




There's No Way To Stop Children From Viewing Porn In Starbucks

$
0
0

starbucks london

Last week's debate in the Lords on the proposal to stop opt-out pornography filters was a perfect parable about the dangers of putting technically unsophisticated legislators in charge of technology regulation.

The Lords are contemplating legislation to require internet service providers and phone companies to censor their internet connections by default, blocking "adult content," unless an over-18 subscriber opts out of the scheme.

On its face, this seems like a reasonable plan. When I wrote to my MP, Meg Hillier, to let her know I objected to the scheme, she wrote back to say that despite the imperfections in a porn filter, it was better than nothing because kids would always be more sophisticated than their parents when it came to internet technology. The last part is mostly true, but the first part is a nonsense.

In order to filter out adult content on the internet, a company has to either look at all the pages on the internet and find the bad ones, or write a piece of software that can examine a page on the wire and decide, algorithmically, whether it is inappropriate for children.

Neither of these strategies are even remotely feasible. To filter content automatically and accurately would require software capable of making human judgments – working artificial intelligence, the province of science fiction.

As for human filtering: there simply aren't enough people of sound judgment in all the world to examine all the web pages that have been created and continue to be created around the clock, and determine whether they are good pages or bad pages. Even if you could marshal such a vast army of censors, they would have to attain an inhuman degree of precision and accuracy, or would be responsible for a system of censorship on a scale never before seen in the world, because they would be sitting in judgment on a medium whose scale was beyond any in human history.

Think, for a moment, of what it means to have a 99% accuracy rate when it comes to judging a medium that carries billions of publications.

Consider a hypothetical internet of a mere 20bn documents that is comprised one half "adult" content, and one half "child-safe" content. A 1% misclassification rate applied to 20bn documents means 200m documents will be misclassified. That's 100m legitimate documents that would be blocked by the government because of human error, and 100m adult documents that the filter does not touch and that any schoolkid can find.

In practice, the misclassification rate is much, much worse. It's hard to get a sense of the total scale of misclassification by censorware because these companies treat their blacklists as trade secrets, so it's impossible to scrutinise their work and discover whether they're exercising due care.

What's more, many of the people whose content is misclassified are not in a position to discover this (because they are operating a website from outside the country and can't tell if they're being blocked unless a reader in the UK tells them so), and the readers whose requested documents are blocked are often children, or technical naifs, neither of whom are likely to know how to effectively complain about their blocks.

But it's instructive to look at the literature on overblocking. In 2003, the Electronic Frontier Foundation tested the censorware used by US schools to see how many of the most highly-ranked documents on concepts from the national school curriculum were blocked by the school's own censorware. They discovered that 75-85% of these sites were incorrectly classified. That percentage went way, way up when it came to sensitive subjects such as sexuality, reproductive health, and breast cancer.

That study is a decade old, and dates from a time when the web was comparatively minuscule. Today's web is thousands of times larger than the web of 2003. But labour isn't thousands of times cheaper, and good content has not gotten thousands of times easier to distinguish from bad content in the interim.

So when Lady Benjamin spoke of wanting to protect "students doing research for a project", she should have also been thinking of protecting students' access to the documents necessary to do their homework. I just returned from a tour with my new young adult novel, Pirate Cinema, that had me visiting schools in 18 cities in the US and Canada.

Over and over again, teachers and students described the problems they had with school censorware. Not only did their networks block the wrong thing, but what was blocked changed from minute to minute, making it nearly impossible to integrate the internet into curriculum and presentations.

Teachers told me that they'd queue up a video to show to their afternoon class, only to have it incorrectly blocked over the lunchbreak, leaving their lesson plan in tatters with only minutes to come up with an alternative. Students who had come to rely on a site for information related to a project returned to those sites to confirm something, only to discover that it had been put out of reach by a distant, unaccountable contractor working for the school board.

But it's not just "good" material that gets misclassified. There is unquestionably a lot of material on the internet kids shouldn't be seeing, and it multiplies at a staggering rate. Here, you have inverse of the overblocking problem. Miss 1% – or 10%, or a quarter – of the adult stuff, and you allow a titanic amount of racy stuff through. Students who are actively seeking this material – the modern equivalent of looking up curse words in the school dictionary – will surely find it. Students who are innocently clicking from one place to another will, if they click long enough, land on one of these sites. The only way to prevent this is to block the internet.

So when Lady Massey complains that Starbucks has failed its civic duty by allowing unfiltered internet connections in its cafes, she's rather missing the point. Even a filtered connection would pose little challenge to someone who wanted to look at pornography in a public place. Meanwhile, any filter deployed by Starbucks will block all manner of legitimate material that its customers have every right to look at.

The only way to stop people from looking at porn – in print or online – in Starbucks is to ask them to leave if you see them doing it.

So far, I've been writing as though "adult" content can be trivially distinguished from "family friendly" content. The reality is a lot muddier. There's plenty of material in a day's newspaper that I wouldn't want my four-year-old daughter to hear about, from massacres and rapes in Mali to the tawdry personal stories on the agony aunt page. Sorting the "adult" internet from the "child" internet is a complex problem with no right answer.

But you'd never know it, to listen to the censorware vendors. When Boing Boing, the website I co-own, was blocked by one censorware site, it was on the grounds that we were a "nudity" site. That was because, among the tens of thousands of posts we'd made, a few were accompanied by (non-prurient, strictly anatomical) small images showing some nudity.

When we argued our case to the vendor's representative, he was categorical: any nudity, anywhere on the site, makes it into a "nudity site" for the purposes of blocking. The vendor went so far as to state that a single image of Michelangelo's David, on one page among hundreds of thousands on a site, would be sufficient grounds for a nudity classification.

I suspect that none of the censorship advocates in the Lords understand that the offshore commercial operators they're proposing to put in charge of the nation's information access apply this kind of homeopathic standard to objectionable material.

When Lady Howe compares mandatory, opt-out censorware to a rule that requires newsagents to rack their pornographic magazines on the top shelf, I doubt she would stretch her analogy to saying, "If a magazine comprising a hundred thousand pages has a single picture of Michelangelo's David anywhere in its pages, it must have a brown paper cover and be put out of reach of children."

Such an analogy is a nonsense. We don't have magazines with a hundred thousand pages. We don't have town halls or round-tables with millions of participants, all speaking at once. We don't have cable or satellite packages with a billion video channels. Though it is sometimes useful to draw analogies between the internet and all the media of yesteryear, it's important not to lose sight of the fact that these are only analogies, and that the only thing that the internet can properly compared to is the internet.

But back to censorware, and the vendor who censored my site. That company and its competitors are pretty unsavoury. The company does most of its business with Middle Eastern dictatorships, who rely on its software to stop its citizenry from reading the world's free press. The whole censorware industry's bread and butter is selling software that despots use to commit, and cover up, human rights abuse.

These are the firms that we're proposing to put in charge of the nation's information. What's more, as I've written in the past, internet censorship cannot be separated from internet surveillance. If we're these companies are to stop us from seeing the pages they've blocked (according to their own secret, arbitrary criteria), they have to be able to look at all the pages we request, in order to decide which page requests may be passed through and which ones may be blocked.

What's more, as Hillier was quick to remind me, kids are pretty technologically sophisticated. Kids whose parents rely on this filter will discover quickly that their kids have no trouble evading it. As I discovered on my tour, kids know how to search for open proxies on the internet and to use them to beat the filters. Unfortunately, by driving kids to these filters, we put them at risk of surveillance from another group of unaccountable strangers, as the proxy-operators have the ability to see (and even to interfere with) the kids' traffic.

Filtering isn't better than nothing. It blocks unimaginable mountains of legitimate content. It allows enormous quantities of the most ghastly pornography through. It gives unaccountable, sleazy censorware companies the ability to spy on all of our online activity. It doesn't help parents control their kids' online activities.

Lord Swinfen says this is a plan to "ensure children do not accidentally stumble on pornography." He says that its opponents oppose all internet regulation. But really, this proposal isn't about preventing kids from seeing porn, it's about slightly reducing the likelihood that they will. Opposing this law isn't about opposing all internet regulations, just bad ones that do almost no good and enormous harm.

I don't have a good plan for stopping kids — even my kid — from seeking out bad stuff on the internet. I sit with her when she uses the net (something I can do while she's small and doesn't have her own phone) and help her understand how to navigate the net, and what I expect from her. I can only hope that this will be sufficient, because there is no filter, no app, no parental control, that will stop her from getting access to bad stuff if she really wants to. That's the reality of things. If the Chinese government – with its titanic resources and armies of network engineers – can't stop its citizens from seeing the things it wants to block, what hope do I have?

I know that my position would be stronger if I could offer an alternative to censorware. But such an alternative would be wishful thinking. When the government decides that it is its job to stop kids from accidentally or deliberately seeing adult material on the internet, it is tantamount to putting out a call for magic beans, and announcing that the budget for these magic beans is essentially unlimited. As we've seen before – with NHS IT integration, the national database, and other expensive and wasteful IT boondoggles – there is no shortage of unscrupulous sorts in nice suits who'll offer to sell you as many magic beans as you're buying. That doesn't make magic beans any better at solving the nation's problems. The fact that someone will sell you a solution to the great, intractable problems of the modern age doesn't mean that it will work.

This article originally appeared on guardian.co.uk

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Sonia Sotomayor Goes On Sesame Street And Ruins Every Little Girl's Dream

$
0
0

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor stopped by Sesame Street last week to essentially dash Abby Cadabby's hopes of having a career as a princess. 

"Abby pretending to be a princess is fun, but it is definitely not a career," Sotomayor told the pink puppet in a clip that gained prominence on BuzzFeed, the Washington Post, and TIME .

Instead, the justice recommended little girls go to school so they can be a teacher, lawyer, or "even a scientist."

Watch Sotomayor set Abby Cadabby straight, courtesy of Sesame Street:

DON'T MISS: The Supreme Court Is Going To Review A Major Part Of The Voting Rights Act >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Whistleblower Claims The Energy Market Is Rigged

$
0
0

Power companies are "regularly" manipulating Britain's wholesale gas prices, a whistleblower has claimed.

Last night City watchdog the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and energy regulator Ofgem both said they had launched investigations into the claims.

The FSA launched its investigation after whistleblower Seth Freedman told them he saw evidence that wholesale gas prices, used as the basis for domestic energy bills, were manipulated by some of the big power companies according to a report by the Guardian newspaper .

Mr Freedman, who worked at ICIS Heren, a firm which reports gas prices, said he saw what he took to be suspect trading on September 28, which is an important date as it marks the end of the gas industry’s financial year and can influence future prices.

He told his bosses at the firm, a so-called price reporting agency, whose energy prices are used as the basis for large supply contracts between energy firms and gas suppliers, and they alerted Ofgem.

The benchmark prices that ICIS Heren sets are crucial because energy firms base their forward-looking contracts on them. Small changes in prices can cost or save companies millions of pounds.

Allegations of price manipulation come at a sensitive time for the energy industry which has been accused of profiteering at the expense of customers.

This week millions of British gas cutomers wil see price rises averaging of 6 per cent. Other companies including Npower, SSE and Scottish power have also announced price rises.

Experts say that average household energy bills could rise by £118 to a record £1,428 next year. In 2004 the average bill was just £522.

David Cameron recently pledged to make all energy firms automatically put their customers on the cheapest tariffs, a move that was criticised by the industry as unworkable.

Mr Freedman identified what he saw as attempts to distort the prices recorded by ICIS Heren, according to The Guardian newspaper.

He said: “Traders have made clear to me that manipulation of gas prices is taking place on a regular basis. They name big companies among those they accuse of trying to rig prices and reap profits. Market participants claim the fixing of prices is an open secret.”

An FSA spokesman said: “We can confirm that we have received information in relation to the physical gas market and will be analysing the material.”

An Ofgem spokesman confirmed that the regulator had received information “relating to trading in the gas market and is looking into the issue”.

The move has echoes of the recent Libor scandal when banks were accused of fixing the price at which they borrow money. The scandal led to a multi-million pound fine for Barclays and saw chief executive Bob Diamond resign.

Mr Freedman also claimed that prices produced by price reporting agencies can be “unreliable” and undermined by “poorly trained staff”. He said that the relationship between gas traders and internal “price reporters” in the agencies can be “over-cosy”.

He said that traders regularly put price reporters under pressure to change prices they disagree with.

In a statement Ofgem said: “In preparing for full implementation of new EU legislation to tackle market abuse (REMIT), we will consider carefully any evidence of market abuse that is brought to our attention as well as scope for action under all our other powers. Ofgem has already activated its established procedures to review the information we have received.”

In a statement, ICIS said that it had detected some "unusual trading" activity on the British wholesale gas market on September 28, which it reported to energy regulator Ofgem in October.

"The cause of the trading pattern, which involved a series of deals done below the prevailing market trend, has not yet been established. ICIS welcomes the seriousness with which the regulator has so far responded to this information and we have provided all the evidence at our disposal to help the regulator determine what happened,” the company said.

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Eric Holder Is Reportedly Staying On As Attorney General

$
0
0

eric holder

As little as four days ago, the country's attorney general said he was unsure whether he stick with the president for another four years.

But today the New York Post has learned Eric Holder will be staying on as the country's top law-enforcement official.

Holder came under fire this summer over the botched "Fast and Furious" operation in which the U.S. government let arms dealers sell illegal guns in a bid to track the weapons.

But the Justice Department "found no evidence" in September that Holder knew of inappropriate tactics used in the operation.

Still, sources tell the Post not everyone in the White House is happy with Holder's extended tenure.

“I don’t know if everyone in the White House wants him [Holder] to stay, but the important guy does, and that’s all that matters,”a source told the Post.

Holder's office declined to comment to the Post.

DON'T MISS: Chris Christie Said Nothing About A Massive Inmate Escape During Sandy >

 

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



One Law Professor Essentially Wants To Do Away With Law School

$
0
0

College party, drunk, students, happy, fist pumping

A Northwestern law professor has come up with a revolutionary proposal about how to fix the legal education crisis.

Basically, he wants to do away with law school.

In a January op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, Professor John McGinnis argues "states should permit undergraduate colleges to offer majors in law that will entitle graduates to take the bar exam."

If states really want a practical requirement added to the degree, they could "ask graduates to serve one-year apprenticeships before becoming eligible for admission to the bar," according to McGinnis.

And McGinnis is sticking to his guns.

In a panel earlier this week McGinnis suggested 60 hours of coursework would be enough for an undergraduate law degree even though the American Bar Association currently requires 80 hours from an ABA-accredited law school, according to Above The Law.

From ATL:

McGinnis argued that his proposal of allowing for an undergraduate option, to be offered in addition to traditional graduate study in law, would have several advantages. It would lower the cost of getting a legal education, in terms of eliminating both the cost of a J.D. degree and the opportunity cost of graduate study in law, and this lower cost would hopefully translate into lower-priced legal services for consumers. But consumers would still be protected, thanks to the requirement of bar exam passage.

DON'T MISS: Eric Holder Is Reportedly Staying On As Attorney General >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Viewing all 92842 articles
Browse latest View live