Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 87812 articles
Browse latest View live

Berkeley Law Students Booked For Decapitating A Guinea Fowl

$
0
0

helmeted guinea fowl

If true, the shocking animal abuse allegations against two Berkeley law students are pretty sick.

Witnesses claim they saw Eric Cuellar and Justin Teixeira, both 24, emerge from trees at the Flamingo hotel's Wildlife Habitat carrying the body and decapitated head of a 14-year-old helmeted guinea fowl after they were caught on camera chasing the bird, the Las Vegas Sun reported Friday.

The two were allegedly playing catch with the murdered bird's body and didn't seem too upset about the crime.

"According to the security people, the men were laughing and joking about the fact of what they had done," Metro Police Sgt. John Sheahan told KLAS-TV.

The decapitation is considered a felony under Nevada's strict animal rights laws and both men were arrested on suspicion of conspiracy and willful malicious killing of wildlife, according to the New York Daily News.

DON'T MISS: Jerry Sandusky's Lawyer Blew Off Steam With A Bunch Of Penn State Students Right Before The Sentencing >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »




Lawyers Have Pocketed A Massive Amount Of Money From American Airlines' Failures

$
0
0

American Airlines AMR Plane Fuselage Airport Runway Tarmac

AMR Corp., American Airlines parent company, has been fighting a major bankruptcy case for about a year now.

And no one loves that more than the lawyers.

The company is paying about $20 million a month to 34 law firms, consultants and advisers, according to the Tulsa World.

Just in case that number isn't mindblowing enough, the company spent $77,676,873 in only four months on legal and consulting fees.

Those fees have retained some pretty big names.

Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP, Harris Finley & Bogle PC, and Yetter Coleman LLP are just four of the firms that have worked on the bankruptcy in the past year, according to Above The Law.

Of course, Dewey recently filed bankruptcy itself, so it's likely that firm is no longer on the case.

DON'T MISS: While Law Grads Suffer, The Richest Firm In America Is Making Billions >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Thieves Intercepted A Shipment Of New $100 Bills They Won't Be Able To Spend Until 2013

$
0
0

CNN Money reports that a "large amount" of newly-minted $100 bills were stolen by unknown thieves last week, according to the FBI.

The bills were taken from a shipment headed for a Federal Reserve in New Jersey sometime after it landed at Philadelphia International Airport on a commercial flight from Dallas, Texas on Thursday, the FBI said.

The thing is the thieves won't be able to spend the money. That's because the bills don't go into circulation until 2013. 

Here's what it looks like: 

$100 bill

SEE ALSO: 10 Sweet Features Of The New $100 Bill >

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



A Crazy Lawsuit Demanded $3 Billion And Called Casey Anthony An Illuminati

$
0
0

Casey Anthony

A woman claiming Casey Anthony is part of an Illuminati conspiracy and is a danger to the public won't be getting her day in court any time soon.

Naomi Riches' lawsuit against Anthony, who was acquitted last year on charges she murdered her daughter, asked for $3 billion in compensation, claiming Anthony caused her emotional and mental distress, Metro Philadelphia reported Sunday.

The case was dismissed on Wednesday.

The lawsuit is filled with some pretty crazy accusations. Here are the best ones, courtesy of Metro Philadelphia. Note that they are just accusations, not facts:

  • "Casey Anthony is an Illuminati actress who [h]as used the summers of 2009-2011 to mock and harass my current circumstances. Casey Anthony and Nancy Grace are working in cahoots with one another to fill the media with propaganda so that American [c]itizens believe there is [j]ustice in this country. The media is lying and these people are all actors for the Illuminati."

  • Anthony allegedly threatened to kill Riches, stab out her eye, and claimed the government was poisoning Riches' water supply.

  • Hollywood made Riches into a celebrity without her knowledge and people were making "trillions of dollars" off of her.

  •  "She told me that there were cameras lodged in the back of my eyes and that my life is a reality show for the Elite. For months I couldn't use the bathroom to go number 1 or 2 without thinking there was some sick wealthy pervert watching me through the cameras Casey Anthony claimed were lodged in the back of my eyes."

Anthony, who has been in hiding since her not guilty verdict last year, was finally made a free woman in August when her probation on an unrelated charge ended.

She is also currently embroiled in a civil trial with Zenaida Gonzalez who claims her life was ruined when Anthony told police a woman with a similar name kidnapped her daughter.

Check Out Sad Pictures Of Kids Locked Up In America >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Top Candidate For Job At The University Of Iowa Says She Was Blackballed For Fighting Abortion

$
0
0

Teresa Wagner

IOWA CITY, Iowa (AP) — Praised by colleagues as smart, friendly and passionate about the law, Teresa Wagner was a leading candidate when two jobs came open to teach writing at the University of Iowa law school. An alumnus, she was already working part-time at its writing center and received positive reviews from students and a key committee.

But after she interviewed with the faculty in 2007, one job went to someone without teaching experience and the other wasn't filled. She was passed over for other jobs in the coming years. She now says she was blackballed because of her legal work against abortion rights and will take her complaint to a jury this week in a case that is being closely watched in higher education because of longstanding allegations of political bias at left-leaning law schools.

Conservatives have maintained for years that they are passed over for jobs and promotions at law schools because of their views, but formal challenges have been rare, in part because of the difficulty of proving discrimination. Wagner's case is considered the first of its kind.

"This will put a spotlight on a terrible injustice that is being perpetrated throughout American higher education," said Peter Wood, president of the National Association of Scholars, who says he routinely hears from rejected conservative professors. "What makes Teresa Wagner's case so extraordinary is she came up with the documentary evidence of what was really going on."

But some scholars worry that challenges like Wagner's could force law schools to begin openly considering the political views of job applicants, opening the way for more lawsuits and court interference in hiring.

At a federal trial that starts Monday in Davenport, Wagner will argue that the law school faculty blocked her appointment because she had opposed abortion rights, gay marriage and euthanasia while working as a lawyer for the Family Research Council and the National Right to Life Committee in Washington.

Wagner says the opposition to her was led by professor Randall Bezanson, a law clerk for Justice Harry Blackmun when he wrote the landmark Roe vs. Wade decision that legalized abortion in 1973 — an opinion Wagner spent her earlier career opposing. She says 46 of 50 faculty members who considered her appointment were Democrats, while one was Republican. Wagner will offer as evidence an e-mail from a school official who backed her candidacy warning the dean that some opposed her "because they so despise her politics (and especially her activism about it)."

Wagner declined an interview request before trial, but told Fox News in April that liberals were protective of prestigious faculty appointments. "Republicans need not apply," she said.

Lawyers representing the law school will argue that Wagner was passed over after botching an answer during a 2007 job interview with the faculty, a claim her attorney calls a pretext.

A number of studies in recent years have examined party affiliation, ideology and donations to candidates and concluded that law professors are overwhelmingly left-leaning.

Many law schools recruit conservative scholars to join their faculty and top law schools pride themselves on having prominent representatives of different perspectives. Some law schools, especially those affiliated with the Catholic church and other religions, also lean strongly conservative. Still, many liberals concede they outnumber their colleagues on faculties around the country but say reasons such as career choices may explain the disparity, not discrimination in hiring.

Walter Olson, senior fellow at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, said business conservatives with expertise in regulatory and antitrust law are well-represented on faculties. But he said he would be hard-pressed to name any professor at a non-religious school who opposed the Roe decision before winning tenure.

As a lawyer for conservative groups, Wagner wrote papers and books and filed court briefs on behalf of conservative social causes after graduating from law school in 1993.

She moved back to Iowa City with her husband and four children in 2006 to raise their family. She says she had the necessary experience for the law school openings because she had taught writing at George Mason law school in Virginia and an ethics class at Notre Dame. In 2002, she'd turned down a job offer from Ave Marie Law School, a conservative Catholic institution then located in Ann Arbor, Mich.

"I thought she was going to be dynamic in the classroom," said Ave Marie dean emeritus Bernard Dobranski. "She was very lively and vivacious."

But Wagner says an associate Iowa dean told her to conceal her connection to Ave Maria during the interview because it would be viewed negatively. Before professors voted on whether to recommend her hiring, she claims Bezanson spoke in opposition.

In a deposition, Bezanson said that he "picked up someone saying she was conservative" during discussions but denied that was the driving factor in his opposition. "However anybody voted, nobody is ever stupid enough to say anything about that in a faculty meeting," said Bezanson, an expert on free speech.

The law school says Wagner told them she would not teach legal analysis, which professors found unacceptable since it was in the job description.

Professor Michael Vitiello, of University of the Pacific law school in Sacramento, has argued that claims of liberal bias at law schools are overblown. He said Wagner's case posed intriguing questions about whether political views should be considered in hiring decisions.

"There is something very interesting, seeing conservatives suing on job discrimination claims because suddenly they are portraying themselves as victims," he said. "This case is filled with all sorts of ironies."

Olson, of the Cato Institute and author of a book on legal academia, said the jury's decision "could shake up lots of hiring practices. If they say state universities are under scrutiny to make sure they are not discriminating against viewpoints, then a lot of people can sue, a lot of cases are going to be pretty good and the universities are going to have someone looking over their shoulder."

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



The Black Keys Settle Lawsuit With Home Depot & Pizza Hut Over Cheesy Bites Ad

$
0
0

The Black KeysRock duo the Black Keys have reached a state of harmony with Pizza Hut and Home Depot.

Or at least they've agreed to call off the lawyers.

The group, along with their producer Danger Mouse, have reached settlement agreements with the pizza chain and the home-goods giant, after filing suits against them in June, according to court papers obtained by TheWrap.

Also read: The Black Keys Sue Pizza Hut and Home Depot Over Ads

According to court papers, the parties have requested that the suits, which were filed in U.S. District Court in California, remain on the docket while they finish documenting the settlements.

The group and its producer claimed that Pizza Hut, in "a brazen and improper effort to capitalize on Plaintiffs' hard-earned success," used the group's 2011 song "Gold on the Ceiling" in an ad for their Cheesy Bites Pizza without authorization, and that Home Depot had done the same with their song "Lonely Boy" in a commercial for Ryobi power tools.

Also read: Review: Black Keys' Glam 'El Camino" Leaves Blues in the Dust

The group had sought injunctions against the companies from further using the songs, plus reimbursement for profits derived from the songs' use, unspecified damages, interest, attorneys' fees and court costs.

Terms of the settlements were not disclosed, and the group's attorney has not yet responded to TheWrap's request for comment.

However, if the group suddenly finds itself with an abundance of Cheesy Bites pizza and bathroom tiles, you'll know why.

Pamela Chelin contributed to this report.

SEE ALSO: Steven Tyler's lawyer being sued over botched 'American Idol' contract negotiations >

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Arlen Specter Inserted Himself Into History's Most Contentious Supreme Court Nominations

$
0
0

arlen specter new york comedy

Former U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter, who died Sunday, was at the center of two of the more divisive Supreme Court nominations in recent history.

Specter was a controversial figure himself, having lost his Senate seat by defecting from the Republican party in 2009.

But before he lost his seat, he famously angered conservatives in 1987 by voting against Ronald Reagan's Supreme Court nominee Judge Robert Bork.

Current Justice Anthony Kennedy eventually took the seat.

Four years later though, Specter again ruffled some feathers, this time by backing the nomination of Justice Clarence Thomas and attacking the credibility of Anita Hill, who accused Thomas of sexual harassment.

The public outcry over his attacks nearly cost him his Senate seat in 1992, the New York Times reported in his obituary.

SEE ALSO: Priceless Photos Of Supreme Court Justices When They Were Young And Carefree >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



The Supreme Court Is Going To Decide Whether You Have To Prove You're A Citizen Before You Can Vote

$
0
0

immigrants immigration

The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to rule on the constitutionality of a state requirement that voters must prove they are U.S. citizens before they register to vote and cast their ballots.  

The Court granted review of an Arizona case in which they previously had refused the state’s request to block a lower court decision that struck down that requirement. 

Arizona’s voters adopted that law when they passed “Proposition 200″ in 2004.  The Court will not rule on the case until after this year’s election, so the requirement will not be in effect next month.  (The case is Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council, docket 11-71.)

That was the only new case granted Monday.   In one significant denial, the Court refused to consider imposing a heavier duty on managers of employee retirement plans to justify investing plan assets in the company’s own stock.  The Court turned aside without comment two petitions on that issue.  (Gray v. Citigroup, 11-1531, and Gearren v. McGraw-Hill Companies, 11-1550.)

The new Arizona voting rights case is important not only because of the citizenship proof requirement, but perhaps even more so because it calls on the Court to sort out the cooperative but sometimes conflicting roles of the state governments and Congress in regulating election procedures.   In its petition, the state of Arizona complained that the Ninth Circuit Court, in nullifying Proposition 200, had created a new test for when states must yield to Congress in their control of elections.

Read more about the Arizona case at SCOTUSblog.

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »




The NYPD Is In Trouble Over This Video Of Cops Beating A Special Needs Man

$
0
0

Twitter user @911BUFF tweeted this horribly disturbing video of what looks like two police officers beating a young man senseless.

The cops throw the young man on the couch and beat him with their fists and batons.

The man has been identified as a 22-year-old Jewish man with special needs named Ehud Halevy, according to Matzav.com, which reported that blog Crownheights.info was the first to publish the video.

The alleged beating took place in the early hours of Oct. 8 at the ALIYA Alternative Learning Institute for Young Adults.

Officers reportedly tried to handcuff Halevy before the incident escalated.

The department has opened a "massive investigation about this video," according to @911BUFF.

Watch the full video here:

The incident began because a man refused to leave the women's part of the center, NYPD Deputy Commissioner Paul Brown told Business Insider.

He also confirmed the NYPD Internal Affairs Bureau is investigating.

DON'T MISS: Two LAPD Cops And Their Boss Have Been Taken Off Streets After Alleged Nurse Beating

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



The ACLU Is Accusing Morgan Stanley Of 'Reverse-Redlining' And Issuing Mass-Produced Loans

$
0
0

attached image

The American Civil Liberties Union sued Morgan Stanley on Monday, alleging racial discrimination over packaging subprime mortgage loans into securities.

The suit is the first to directly accuse an investment bank, rather than a lender, over loans that violate federal civil rights laws, the group said at a press conference.

Morgan Stanley encouraged a unit of now-bankrupt New Century Financial Corp to target black borrowers disproportionately with loans that had a strong possibility of foreclosure and unjustifiably high costs, the suit alleges. The investment bank received significant fees from packaging and selling these loans as securities to institutional investors, while the borrowers faced high risks of default, the ACLU said.

"It is literally the first case of Main Street holding Wall Street accountable" for the financial crisis that led millions of Americans to lose their homes and that devastated the U.S. economy, ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero said at a news conference.

Morgan Stanley rejected the accusations. "We believe these allegations are completely without merit and plan to defend ourselves vigorously," spokeswoman Mary Claire Delaney said in an email.

The complaint was filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan on behalf of five Detroit residents. It alleges that Morgan Stanley went beyond the traditional role of an investment bank by helping to fund loans made by New Century, setting loan volume goals and establishing terms of the loans.

The ACLU asked the court to certify the case as a class action. It said as many as 6,000 black homeowners in the Detroit area may have suffered similar discrimination as a result of being offered loans that many could not afford.

The alleged practice is a twist on claims that banks engaged in "red-lining," or refusing to provide loans and other services in low-income areas.

"It's reverse red-lining. It violates the Fair Housing Act," said Elizabeth Cabraser, a co-counsel for the plaintiffs. "These loans were mass produced and they were built to order, not to serve homeowners."

Discriminatory practices connected to the securitization process were endemic during the last decade throughout much of the financial services industry and across the nation, the ACLU said.

Critics of securitization, in which banks package loans into securities for sale to sophisticated investors, say it allows banks to be reckless in their credit policies because they do not end up holding the loans.

Advocates say that by removing loans from bank balance sheets, it allows them to stimulate the economy by extending credit across a variety of sectors.

Trillions of dollars of mortgage, credit card, automobile and other consumer loans have been securitized and sold to investors. Many of the home loans bought by the banks are insured by agencies such as the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., or Freddie Mac, and the Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae.

Many Recent Lawsuits

The ACLU lawsuit follows a spate of new litigation against Wall Street by U.S. federal and state authorities over banks' roles in triggering the financial crisis that began more than four years ago.

JPMorgan was sued last week by New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman for alleged subprime mortgage abuses at an investment bank that it purchased during the financial crisis. The U.S. attorney in Manhattan filed fraud charges against Wells Fargo Corp two weeks ago for a "reckless pattern" of making questionable home loans that allegedly cost the government hundreds of millions of dollars in insurance settlements.

Massachusetts earlier sued Morgan Stanley for securitizing home loans, alleging violations of a state consumer protection law. The ACLU said that case did not address the issue nationwide nor link the alleged abusive practices to discriminatory policy.

Thomas Deutsch, executive director of the American Securitization Forum, a trade group for investment banks, declined to comment on the lawsuit.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs also include the National Consumer Law Center and Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, a San Francisco-based law firm.

The case is Beverly Adkins et al v Morgan Stanley, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 12-7667.

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Scalia Explains Why Only Jews And Catholics Are On The Supreme Court

$
0
0

Antonin Scalia

Justice Antonin Scalia said recently the public's declining interest in religion has made it possible for the Supreme Court to have no Protestants for the first time ever, the National Catholic Register reports.

"The fact that the Supreme Court consists of–what now?–six Catholics and three Jews: I would like to believe that it's because of more religious toleration, but I think it's actually because of indifference," Scalia said.

During a packed talk at the Catholic Information Center, Scalia said the separation of church and state is more important in America than anywhere else despite this growing indifference, the Catholic Register reported.

And Scalia, a devout Catholic, seemed to offer an explanation for how he can use his position to oppose abortion while still respecting that separation.

"'[G]ood government should abide by natural law," Scalia reportedly said. "And, as Catholic Church teaches, natural law prohibits certain things, such as abortion, that Catholics in public life can oppose."

SEE ALSO: Scalia's Anti-Gay Comments Are Nothing Compared To This Hateful Opinion On Sodomy Laws

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Danish Man Claims He Was A CIA Double Agent Inside Al-Qaeda

$
0
0

Morten Storm

A Danish man claims that he helped the CIA track radical American cleric Anwar al-Awlaki until the al-Qaeda figure was killed in a U.S. drone strike in September 2011, Brian Ross of ABC News reports.

Muslim convert Morten Storm provided letters, emails, audio recordings and videos to the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten that he says prove that he became a double agent for the Danish intelligence service (PET) and later was paid $250,000 by the CIA to find al-Awlaki a wife.

Storm, 36, said that he gave al-Awlaki — a New Mexico-born cleric who called for jihad against Americans — a bugged USB stick that tracked the al-Qaeda propagandist until an American drone strike killed him in Yemen in September 2011.

The CIA declined to comment to ABC News.

Storm said he was a radical Islamist in the UK in the mid-2000s before being turned by PET in 2006. He claims that he befriended al-Awlaki after traveling to Yemen several times and eventually the cleric would ask Storm, through encrypted USB messages, to buy things like clothes and perfume for his wife.

Storm provided the Danish newspaper with "proposal" videos and e-mails that seem to corroborate that he found al-Awlaki his third wife, a 32-year-old Croatian named Aminah who now works for "Inspire" — the al-Qaeda on-line magazine in which al-Awlaki's writings appeared.

Bruce Riedel, a former CIA officer, told ABC News that Storm's story "is consistent with how you would infiltrate a terrorist group like al Qaeda" because Storm is "the perfect kind of infiltrator, perfect kind of plant inside of al Qaeda."

The PET denied playing a part in al-Awlaki's death, but Storm's story has caused some public anger in Denmark among citizens who are concerned that their government participated in an illegal assassination given that al-Awlaki was a U.S. citizen.

In February the ACLU filed a suit against the Obama administration to force the government to explain the legal basis for the strikes that killed al-Awlaki, his 16-year-old son, and Samir Khan (all U.S. citizens). 

Here is the "proposal" video that Storm gave Jyllands-Posten:

SEE ALSO: A Top Reporter In Yemen Explains What's Really Going On In The Country's Secret US Drone War >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Hollywood Banker Told Police He Used Bath Salts Days Before LAPD Beatdown

$
0
0

Brian Mulligan

In May, TV executive-turned-big time Hollywood banker Brian Mulligan filed a claim accusing LAPD officers of beating him without probable cause after a confrontation with police that led to his arrest.

Mulligan—the 52-year-old vice chairman and managing director of Deutsche Bank’s Los Angeles media practice—was in a seedy neighborhood holding $5,000 in cash when police allegedly found him trying to enter moving vehicles.

LAPD placed Mulligan in a motel for the night and him told not to leave, but the banker allegedly didn't listen and was again found by LAPD on the street in the Highland Park area.

When confronted by LAPD, Mulligan reportedly resisted arrest by raising his arms and growling like a bear. LAPD then allegedly beat Mulligan to the ground, which resulted in the banker fracturing his nose, for which he has now claimed damages of as much as $50 million.

Then, in August, a gruesome photo of a beaten and bloody Mulligan went public, as well as a report that he was on "white lightning" or "bath salts" during the incident.

Mulligan and his attorney have vehemently denied any drug use and have filed a claim against the LAPD saying his beating was unprovoked.

But the claims that Mulligan was not on drugs have been weakened, as a new audio recording has surfaced of the banker admitting to a Glendale officer that he had ingested bath salts — just two days before the LAPD incident.

The tape starts with Mulligan saying, "My lawyer will probably kill me for saying this but ... I don't know what it is but it's bad ... I've probably used it twenty times."

Mulligan's lawyer has no comment.

Watch the below CBS report discussing the complicated case:

SEE ALSO: Hollywood banker claims $50M in damages after alleged police beating >

Please follow The Wire on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Vote Now: What Are The Best Colleges in America?

$
0
0

college-friends-post-graduation

College tuition has reached record highs and grads are still struggling to get jobs and pay off mounds of student debt.

So, it's more important than ever to have a ranking that asks a simple question: How much will a college help you succeed in life?

Last year, MIT earned the top spot in our list of America's Best Colleges, with Stanford and Harvard trailing close behind.

But have things changed?

To create the fourth annual Business Insider list of the Best Colleges, we need your help. We have selected what we consider the 60 best colleges in America and we want you to help us rank them. Please rate at least 10 of the colleges on this list—and let us know who you're furious that we left off. Also please take this opportunity to sound off on which colleges you think are total ripoffs and which are actually worth your money.

Create your free online surveys with SurveyMonkey, the world's leading questionnaire tool.

Please follow Business Insider on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



The Supreme Court Can't Kill Affirmative Action For Good No Matter How It Rules

$
0
0

Affirmative Action

Richard Thompson Ford notes that whatever the Supreme Court does, they can't really stop universities from using soft measurements to achieve diversity:

 
[T]he rub is that a lot of these are racially correlated, and some may be hard to disentangle from race itself. For instance, if a university considers an applicant's experience with prejudice, in the form of sex discrimination, anti-gay bias, religious bigotry and animosity based on disability, shouldn't it also consider an applicant's experience with racism?
Moreover, when an admissions or hiring decision involves multiple subjective factors, it's very hard to know whether not race, per se, was one of them. 
 
It's not surprising that opponents of affirmative action zero in on objective measures of qualification and merit, because without them to provide a baseline of equal treatment, it's hard to tell whether or not a decision maker has discriminated.
 
Civil rights lawyers in employment discrimination cases do the same thing. For instance, if an employer promotes men over women with more experience, civil rights lawyers point to the superior objective qualifications of the women as gotcha evidence. But the employer can always retort that the men chosen for the promotions had better soft skills. And that claim is almost impossible to refute because the value of soft skills is a judgment call. 
 
As employers have shifted from objective qualifications to subjective soft skills, and as the courts have deferred to their judgments, it's become increasingly hard to prove employment discrimination. As a result, employment discrimination plaintiffs today lose at a higher rate than any other class of plaintiffs in federal court. Unless the court changes the rules for people who are challenging affirmative action, it will be just as hard to prove that a university considering the long list of factors like the one I laid out above factored in race in an admissions decision.
 
Adam Serwer made a similar point a few months back:
 
"They probably will make a ruling that will further limit affirmative action," says Randall Kennedy, a professor at the Harvard University School of Law and a supporter of affirmative action. "Will it kill affirmative action? No." 
 
Even if Fisher prevails, he says, affirmative action in higher education may well continue--just via methods less explicitly reliant on race. "Even right-wingers get nervous with racial homogeneity," Kennedy argues. "Why do you think they loved Herman Cain so much? If Patrick Buchanan were elected president of the United States, there would have been a person of color in the cabinet." 
 
Previous efforts to curtail what are known as "race-conscious" policies have shown that "universities don't just throw up their hands and give up on racial diversity," says Rick Kahlenberg, an education expert at the Century Foundation. "They look to race-neutral alternatives, some of which can produce substantial racial and ethnic diversity."
 
The point here is not that there will be zero damage, but that affirmative action, at this point in American history, is not so much a single policy but a broad American value. This is, again, one of the great triumphs of the black freedom struggle. From the perspective of the struggle, Hermain Cain is a problem -- but he is a decidedly better problem than the previous ones. He is also the problem we fought for, and thus evidence of progress. 
 
Affirmative action enjoys defenders in the corporate world and the military because of the relative success of the long war. The war continues, regardless of the court.

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »




Arizona Guardsmen Accused Of 'Hobo Hunting' With Paintball Guns

$
0
0

army-soldiers-on-guard

'Hobo hunting,' sexual misconduct, and fraudulent expense reports totaling more than $1 million are some of the allegations facing the Arizona National Guard.

The Arizona Republic recently published a report on criminal and ethical misconduct in the organization based on months of investigations and public records requests from the U.S. Army. Governor Jan Brewer is said to be involved at this point, and has directed further investigations into the "cronyism" and "lack of discipline" which has fostered this sort of lawless culture.

One of the officials who talked to The Republic said, "They (wrongdoers) know nothing's going to happen. Nobody can touch them ... This is the inbred stepsister of the active-duty military."

Among the worst allegations are:

- A noncommissioned officer who got drunk with privates, has sex with a female enlistee and was still allowed to deploy, where he was further disciplined for similar offense. Then, instead of being charged, he was simply moved.

- A group of soldiers who drove around a Humvee and shot people with paint balls, who then bullied a whistleblower. The whistleblower claimed they said to her, "What, you never heard of the 'bum hunts?'" The investigation reveals that the "recruiter of the year" allegedly participated in upward of 35 of these "hunts." They also allegedly made transients perform humiliating "song and dance" routines.

- Several soldiers cited with drunk driving were either let off the hook or faced light discipline.

Governor Jan Brewer has vowed to get to the bottom of the situation, expressing confidence in Maj. Gen. Hugo Salaza, the Arizona National Guards top officer. But Lt. Col. Rob White, a decorated combat veteran who's responsible for future operations in Arizona's Joint Forces Headquarters, wasn't so hopeful.

"The way the Arizona National Guard is today, I would not trust it with my son or daughter," White to The Republic. "It disgusts me ... People don't get fired, they get moved."

The Republic's report is quite thorough, and you can read the rest of it here >

Please follow Military & Defense on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Law Schools Are Asking A Trade Group To Lie About The Terrible Job Market

$
0
0

wizard of oz

Law schools have been begging a prominent trade group to put out a "more positive message" about the job market, the group's executive director recently revealed.

James Leipold, who directs National Association for Legal Professionals, said in the group's newsletter that law schools – and law firms for that matter – are in denial about the uncertain job market.

And they want to enlist NALP to help them pretend that delusion is a reality.

Law schools deans and directors of career services have asked NALP for the "more positive message," and one law school even asked Leipold to describe the entry-level job market as "good."

"Ah, if wishing would only make it so," he wrote.

Leipold suggested the legal industry needs to complete the five stages of grief–denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance–to truly come to terms with the changed job market.

"My sense is that there are quite a few people in law schools, law firms, and other legal services settings around the country who have yet to reach acceptance," Leipold wrote.

SEE ALSO: Lawyer Offers Colleagues Discounts For Laser Treatments In An Amazing Good-bye Email

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



This Courtroom Exchange Shows Why It's So Hard To Prosecute The Alleged 9/11 Plotters

$
0
0

khalid sheikh mohammedOne exchange in the pre-trial hearings in the military commission case against the alleged plotters of 9/11 pointed to the big, dark elephant in the room.

Torture.

The lawyers for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, and four alleged al-Qaeda conspirators contend that their treatment in secret CIA prisons is relevant to every aspect of the case.

But the judge, Army Colonel James Pohl, has repeatedly dismissed issues of torture raised by the defense.

Today Air Force Captain Michael Schwartz, Mohammed's lawyer, brought up the subject when arguing that forcibly bringing the defendants out of their cells and into court would remind them of their time in CIA custody.

The judge, Army Colonel James Pohl, once again declared that the topic of torture was not relevant to the discussion.

From Reuters

"We have to talk about torture," Schwartz said.

"No we don't," the judge replied.

"I think we do," Schwartz said.

"I'm telling you I don't think that's relevant to this issue. That's the end of that," Pohl snapped.

When Schwartz persisted, Pohl said angrily, "Are you having trouble hearing me? Move on to something else!"

The government will continue to argue that any statements by the defendants concerning their “exposure” to the CIA’s detention and interrogation program are classified because they concern U.S. intelligence “sources, methods and activities.”

A 2005 Justice Department legal memorandum stated that Mohammed was waterboarded—a technique described as illegal torture by top Obama administration officials—a total of 183 times in March 2003. Eventually he allegedly confessed to planning the attacks.

The military commission's own rules state that any statement "obtained by use of torture shall not be admitted into evidence against any party or witness."

So the question is not whether torture occurred, but what torture-related evidence will be allowed on either side and if the public will ever hear about it.

SEE ALSO: The 'Enhanced Interrogation' Techniques Used After 9/11 Came Straight From This Military Manual >

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



The International Organized Crime Industry Is Worth $870 Billion

$
0
0

Mafia Germany Shooting Ndrangheta

International organised crime is worth 870 billion dollars, the head of the UN's office on drugs and crime (UNODC) said Monday, urging greater coordination in fighting it.

"We are able to quantify the cost of transnational organised crime, it is $870 billion (672 billion euros)," UNODC executive director Yury Fedotov told a crime conference in Vienna.

"But we cannot calculate the misery and suffering caused to millions of people by these illicit activities," he added.

The perpetrators are "smart, sophisticated and largely opportunistic," he said, calling for better international cooperation to tackle highly mobile organised crime groups.

Some 800 ministers and civil society representatives are attending the week-long conference on transnational crime in the Austrian capital.

Please follow Law & Order on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



The Problem With Psychics Meddling With Missing Person Investigations

$
0
0

psychic crystal ball

Harsha Maddula, a Northwestern University pre-medical student from Long Island, N.Y., went missing Sept. 22, last seen leaving an off-campus party in Illinois. Police and volunteer searchers were unable to find him, but Maddula's family said reassuring words from psychics had raised their spirits.

Apparently, psychics contacted by the Maddula family's relatives in India said Harsha was okay and would be found: "He's still alive. Don't worry.'"

The next day, however, Maddula's body was found in Wilmette Harbor near his dormitory. He'd been dead for nearly a week, hidden from searchers in the water between two boats. There was no sign of struggle, robbery, or assault; though toxicology tests are still underway, police believe he was likely the victim of an accidental drowning.

This is only the latest of many cases where grieving families of missing persons have been given false hope by psychics. Despite the failure of psychic detectives to locate missing people, desperate families often turn to psychic and soothsayers. [Top 10 Unexplained Phenomena]

It happens regularly: grieving families hoping psychics will recover their missing loved ones are always disappointed. Still, even if they don't believe in psychics, they conclude that nothing else has worked, so there's no harm in trying.

Indeed, as a news article on Michigan Live.com noted, the mother of a missing woman will be seeking advice from a nationally-known psychic next week: "The mother of Venus Stewart, who has been missing since April 2010 and is presumed to have been killed by her estranged husband, has been invited to appear on the syndicated talk show 'Dr. Phil,'" according to Live.com. The news article went on to say the mother Therese McComb of Colon, Mich., would fly to Los Angeles next week to tape the show, which will air in November. On the show, famed psychic John Edward will try to contact Stewart's spirit to possibly get information about the whereabouts of her body.

"I'm desperate' to find Stewart's body and have closure," McComb said. 'This is about a desperate mother. That's what it is," she added.

If Edward can lead police and the McComb family to where Venus Stewart is, dead or alive, it would be the first time it's happened. Instead of leading police to missing persons, psychics typically offer vague feelings and impressions, and contradictory, fruitless "information."

In high-profile cases, hundreds of different psychics often give hundreds of different opinions about where a person is; sadly none of the information leads to their recovery. As McComb said, these are the actions of desperate mothers, those who have nowhere else to turn. Yet, however well-intentioned the psychics are, grieving families deserve truth instead of misinformation and false hopes. 

Those who listen to well-known psychics on daytime TV shows should note famous psychic Sylvia Browne's appearance on "The Montel Williams Show" in which she told the parents of missing child Shawn Hornbeck that their son was dead: kidnapped and killed by a very tall "dark-skinned man," his body would be found in a wooded area near two large boulders. In fact, Hornbeck and another boy were found very much alive January 16, 2007, in the home of Michael Devlin, the Caucasian man who'd kidnapped them. Every detail of Browne's psychic vision was wrong.

At least the anguish of being wrongly told their son was dead faded when Shawn Hornbeck was found alive. Sadly, the same did not happen for Harsha Maddula's family, told by psychics that he was alive when he was not.

Benjamin Radford is deputy editor of Skeptical Inquirer science magazine and author of six books including Scientific Paranormal Investigation: How to Solve Unexplained Mysteries. His Web site is www.BenjaminRadford.com.

Please follow Science on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »



Viewing all 87812 articles
Browse latest View live